This book explores the often-misunderstood relationship between overthinking decisions and values alignment—the ways endless analysis and consideration can function as avoidance of what you already know serves you. It examines how values-aligned decision-making advice can paradoxically increase paralysis: more frameworks to consider, more criteria to weigh, more ways to question whether you're choosing correctly. The text reframes chronic indecision not as lack of clarity about values but as conflict between what you know aligns with you and what you fear choosing would cost. Rather than offering more tools to identify values or make better decisions, the book explores what keeps you stuck in analysis—the ways overthinking protects you from making choices your system knows will require uncomfortable change, boundary-setting, or disappointing others. It examines patterns beneath decision paralysis: using values clarification to delay action, treating every choice as permanent and defining, seeking permission from external validation rather than internal knowing. What does your inability to decide actually reveal about what you know you need but fear claiming? Through compassionate psychological insight, the text explores the difference between genuine uncertainty and protective overthinking—and why you often know exactly what aligns with your values but can't act on it. It examines what actually allows decisions to emerge from authentic alignment versus what keeps you perpetually weighing options as defense against choosing. This explores values-aligned decision-making not as technique to learn but as permission to trust what you already sense—and understanding what that trust would require you to risk.