Frankenstein
あらすじ
No synopsis available.
作品考察・見どころ
AIが作品の魅力を深く読み解いています
原作・関連書籍
ドラマ・アニメ化された映像作品と原作・関連本と読み比べて、オリジナルならではの違いや描かれなかった裏設定、より深い世界観を独自の視点から楽しみましょう。
No synopsis available.
AIが作品の魅力を深く読み解いています
ドラマ・アニメ化された映像作品と原作・関連本と読み比べて、オリジナルならではの違いや描かれなかった裏設定、より深い世界観を独自の視点から楽しみましょう。
監督・制作: ケヴィン・コナー / Mark Kruger
脚本: メアリー・シェリー / Mark Kruger
音楽: Roger Bellon
制作会社: Hallmark Entertainment
***The most faithful version of Mary Shelley’s classic gothic horror novel*** A Hallmark production, "Frankenstein" (2004) is the most literary faithful filmic version of the oft-done tragedy. Luke Goss looks more like the novel’s depiction of the creature (with long black hair and white teeth) than Boris Karloff in the Universal classics or Robert De Niro in the 1994 version, but he’s also too handsome in a dark gothic way, resembling Type O Negative’s Peter Steele. The creature in the 1994 version didn’t have hair and was a more gruesome depiction, which fits Victor’s description of the creature in the book as “hideous” (then, again, Victor was extremely biased against his creation). While this rendition and the 1994 one are the most faithful to Shelley’s book, they each omit parts and change certain things. For instance, both omit Victor’s traveling to Scotland and, later, Ireland, which was a good call. Actually, I think both versions improve the story in different ways. When Victor and the creature finally meet and have a discussion in the high country, this one has them meet at a ruined castle, which is an excellent deviation. The 1994 version has them talk at a remote glacial dwelling, which is closer to what occurs in the novel. My favorite part is when the monster finds sanctuary with the rural family, unbeknownst to them. It helps the viewer get to know the creature and have compassion on his plight. In the book and the 1994 version all sympathy is pretty much lost eventually while this rendition paints the creature more sympathetically. The locket sequence is lame though, but that was a weak point of the novel as well. Alec Newman is intense and brooding as Victor Frankenstein and I could relate to his work obsessions carried out in his nightgown (or whatever). Any problems with the flick are due to translating a convoluted 19th century gothic horror classic to modern cinema. With almost an hour more to play with compared to the 1994 version, this one has the luxury of taking its time and is the better for it IMHO. The 1994 movie, by contrast, is overly manic and melodramatic because it tried to cram too much into two hours. The film runs 2 hours, 56 minutes, and was shot in Slovakia and Norway. GRADE: B+
