FindKey

FindKeyは、100万件を超える映画・ドラマ作品、そして数百万人の人物データと独自の16類型CTI診断を統合した、日本初の感情特化型映画レコメンドエンジンです。

Find (見つける) + Key (鍵・正解)

映画に限らず、人生のヒントを見つける場所です。

FindKeyについてロケ地 (試験中)利用規約プライバシーポリシーお問い合わせ
© 2026 Bennu Inc.TMDB Logo

本サービスはTMDB APIを利用していますが、TMDBによる推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。

ミッション:インポッシブル2
ミッション:インポッシブル2

ミッション:インポッシブル2

“不可能を可能にする!”

20002h 4m★ 6.1アドベンチャーアクションスリラー

あらすじ

休暇中のイーサンのもとに、緊急指令が下った。それはテロ集団に奪われた致死細菌“キメラ”の奪回。早速新チームが編成されるが、そこには見知らぬ女盗賊・ナイアの名があった。不審に思いながら、イーサンは彼女に接近を図る。

作品考察・見どころ

ジョン・ウー監督が持ち込んだ様式美の極致、それこそが本作の最大の魔力です。スパイ映画の枠を超え、鳩が舞いスローモーションが多用されるバイオレンス・バレエは、観る者の視覚を陶酔させます。イーサン・ハントの超人的な肉体美と、限界を突破するスタントが融合し、一瞬の静寂と爆発的なアクションが織りなすリズムは唯一無二の芸術性を放っています。 物語の核にあるのは、任務と情愛の狭間で揺れる人間ドラマの濃厚さです。トム・クルーズが見せる憂いを帯びた表情と、敵対する者同士がバイクで激突する魂のぶつかり合いは、まさに現代の騎士道物語。論理的な整合性よりも、感情の昂ぶりを映像に焼き付けようとする情熱が、観客の本能を揺さぶり、圧倒的なカタルシスへと誘うのです。

興行成績

製作費: $125,000,000 (188億円)

興行収入: $546,388,108 (820億円)

推定収支: $421,388,108 (632億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

Amazon Prime Video
Disney Plus
U-NEXT

予告・トレイラー

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

Amazon Prime Video
Disney Plus
U-NEXT
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
TELETOON+ Amazon Channel

レンタル・購入

Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies

キャスト

トム・クルーズ
トム・クルーズ
Ethan Hunt
ダグレイ・スコット
ダグレイ・スコット
Sean Ambrose
タンディ・ニュートン
タンディ・ニュートン
Nyah Hall
ヴィング・レイムス
ヴィング・レイムス
Luther Stickell
リチャード・ロクスバーグ
リチャード・ロクスバーグ
Hugh Stamp
John Polson
John Polson
Billy Baird
ブレンダン・グリーソン
ブレンダン・グリーソン
McCloy
ラデ・シェルベッジア
ラデ・シェルベッジア
Dr. Nekhorvich
ウィリアム・メイポーザー
ウィリアム・メイポーザー
Wallis
ドミニク・パーセル
ドミニク・パーセル
Ulrich

スタッフ・制作会社

監督: ジョン・ウー

脚本: ロバート・タウン / ブルース・ゲラー / Brannon Braga

音楽: ハンス・ジマー

制作: トム・クルーズ / ポーラ・ワグナー / テレンス・チャン

撮影監督: Jeffrey L. Kimball

制作会社: Paramount Pictures / Cruise/Wagner Productions

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

Per Gunnar Jonsson
Per Gunnar Jonsson
★ 5

This is a decent enough mindless action movie with a lot of over the top action but it is not really a Mission Impossible movie. The movie starts of reasonably well being somewhat intelligent with a bit of Mission Impossible feel to it. It is actually almost a bit slow at times. However, for the second half of the movie it really degrades into a classical John Woo, over the top, action feast with all pretense of intelligence and any true Mission Impossible feel gone. John Woo is not the right person to make a Mission Impossible movie. As with the first movie if it would not have been labelled Mission Impossible I would probably have given it a higher rating since it is a decent enough, mostly braindead though, Hollywood action movie. However, I have higher expectations from a movie labelled Mission Impossible. Tom Cruise is quite okay as Ethan Hunt. Dougray Scott is okayish as the bad guy. Sometimes he projects the right big bad and mad bad-guy attitude but sometimes he is just silly and just as over the top as the action scenes. He is supposed to be a mastermind but he comes out as a thug a’ la a not so intelligent drug baron in many scenes. The action scenes? Well, they are classical John Woo material. Fast paced with a lot of stunts and things that go boom. They are also, as expected, hugely over the top and unbelievable. They provide a enjoyable visual experience but, as I wrote above, they are not really what I would expect from a Mission Impossible movie. The romance between Hunt and Nyah is the typical Hollywood, let’s throw in a sexy girl and some superficial attraction, which develops from get lost to I love you in the matter of a few hours of contact, between the lead character and the girl. Meh! I get the impression that the people that have created these movies so far have not really watched a single full season of Mission Impossible.

Gimly
Gimly
★ 3

The first underwhelmed me, but this one straight-up bored me. Again, of course seeing Hunt climb a mountain without a harness is impressive sure. And I even quite liked the idea behind the villain of the piece (though even that angle was woefully underdeveloped). Even setting it in predominantly Australia was enough to grab my attention, and that's saying something cause I'm pretty biased when it comes to that. I hear tell that _Mission: Impossible II_ is the low point in the series, and that at least is encouraging, because if anything afterwards is much worse than this one, I don't know if I'll be able to make it through to Rogue Nation. _Final rating:★½: - Boring/disappointing. Avoid if possible._

aardwark69
aardwark69
★ 2

After quite entertainign Mission Impossible I the second installment turned out ... terrible. As if the screenwriters didn't know how to fill the 2 hrs with action the overuse of heroic slow motion scenes is horrible. You almost might need a barf bag if you can't stand slo-mo every five seconds... for 15 seconds. I am amazed they did decide to push on with more M:I movies after this one, then again, these turned out much much better even if it would be hard to beat that lousy piece of crap of a movie.

CinemaSerf
CinemaSerf
★ 5

"Ambrose" (Dougray Scott) is a disavowed IMF agent with a grudge. He is determined to procure and release a deadly hybrid "chimera" virus onto the streets of Sydney so he can push up the share price of the company that wins his auction to acquire it; and that can also manufacture the antidote "Bellerophon". It falls to "Ethan" (Tom Cruise) and his inventive gang of regulars to come up with a way to thwart this plot. To that end, he recruits the brassy thief "Nyah" (Thandiwe Newton) who gets to play a real love interest with "Ethan" whilst feigning one with "Ambrose" to get close to him and learn his plans. On the face of it, this is an ideal screenplay for this franchise, a sort of "James Bond" theme with plenty of location cinematography, action scenes and the odd gadget. Sadly, though, Scott is just not very menacing as the baddie and the story is really under-developed. The characters appear to be almost grinning their way through the unremarkable dialogue, and John Woo creates then recreates the action scenes as if it were just some sort of cartoon feature. The standard of the production is high, the staging of those action scenes is strong and well photographed, but the story just doesn't ever really get into gear and at over two hours, it's a pretty weak and insipid outing for just about everyone. Not a patch on the first film.

Brent Western
Brent Western
★ 3

This movie generally follows the formula of most spy and action movies, and certainly fits into the mission, impossible mold. I’m not much of a cinephile, and don’t normally notice a slight directorial selections, but the directing in this was terrible. Constant cut ways to waves or buildings or other things. This movie was not only anticlimactic with the final fight scene, which is poorly paste and poorly directed. Some of the set pieces were cool, but this went from being a spy type movie to more of an action movie and didn’t deliver on the promise. The first movie gave us. Probably the lowest in the mission impossible franchise.

おすすめの作品