FindKey

FindKeyは、100万件を超える映画・ドラマ作品、そして数百万人の人物データと独自の16類型CTI診断を統合した、日本初の感情特化型映画レコメンドエンジンです。

Find (見つける) + Key (鍵・正解)

映画に限らず、人生のヒントを見つける場所です。

FindKeyについてロケ地 (試験中)利用規約プライバシーポリシーお問い合わせ
© 2026 Bennu Inc.TMDB Logo

本サービスはTMDB APIを利用していますが、TMDBによる推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。

シビル・ウォー アメリカ最後の日
シビル・ウォー アメリカ最後の日

シビル・ウォー アメリカ最後の日

“お前は、どの種類のアメリカ人だ?”

20241h 49m★ 6.9戦争アクションドラマ

あらすじ

連邦政府から19もの州が離脱したアメリカ。テキサスとカリフォルニアの同盟からなる“西部勢力”と政府軍の間で内戦が勃発し、各地で激しい武力衝突が繰り広げられていた。「国民の皆さん、我々は歴史的勝利に近づいている——」。就任 “3期目”に突入した権威主義的な大統領はテレビ演説で力強く訴えるが、ワシントンD.C.の陥落は目前に迫っていた。ニューヨークに滞在していた4人のジャーナリストは、14ヶ月一度も取材を受けていないという大統領に単独インタビューを行うため、ホワイトハウスへと向かう。だが戦場と化した旅路を行く中で、内戦の恐怖と狂気に呑み込まれていくー

作品考察・見どころ

本作が突きつけるのは、政治的信条を排した「戦場の剥き出しの真実」です。アレックス・ガーランド監督は崩壊するアメリカを冷徹に切り取り、観客を硝煙の渦中へ放り込みます。日常が戦場へ変貌する恐怖を、極限の音響と映像美で描き出す手腕は、単なる劇映画を超えた「体感型のアポカリプス」そのものです。 戦場カメラマンの瞳を通し、シャッターを切る瞬間の狂気的な美学を描いた点も秀逸です。記録することの尊さと残酷さの狭間で、キルスティン・ダンストらが見せる鬼気迫る演技は、観る者の倫理観を激しく揺さぶります。現代社会への痛烈な警笛と映像芸術が融合したこの衝撃を、ぜひ全身で浴びてください。

興行成績

製作費: $50,000,000 (75億円)

興行収入: $126,542,249 (190億円)

推定収支: $76,542,249 (115億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

Netflix
Amazon Prime Video
Hulu

予告・トレイラー

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

Netflix
Amazon Prime Video
Hulu
U-NEXT
Netflix Standard with Ads
Amazon Prime Video with Ads

レンタル・購入

Amazon Video
Apple TV Store

キャスト

キルスティン・ダンスト
キルスティン・ダンスト
Lee
ヴァグネル・モウラ
ヴァグネル・モウラ
Joel
ケイリー・スピーニー
ケイリー・スピーニー
Jessie
スティーヴン・マッキンリー・ヘンダーソン
スティーヴン・マッキンリー・ヘンダーソン
Sammy
ネルソン・リー
ネルソン・リー
Tony
ニック・オファーマン
ニック・オファーマン
President
ジェファーソン・ホワイト
ジェファーソン・ホワイト
Dave
Evan Lai
Evan Lai
Bohai
ビンス・ピサニ
ビンス・ピサニ
Concierge
Justin James Boykin
Justin James Boykin
American Soldier (Middle East)

スタッフ・制作会社

監督: アレックス・ガーランド

脚本: アレックス・ガーランド

音楽: ジェフ・バーロウ / ベン・ソーリズブリー

制作: アンドリュー・マクドナルド / Allon Reich / グレゴリー・グッドマン

撮影監督: ロブ・ハーディ

制作会社: DNA Films / IPR.VC / A24

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

Manuel São Bento
Manuel São Bento
★ 8

FULL SPOILER-FREE REVIEW @ https://talkingfilms.net/civil-war-review-a-thought-provoking-dive-into-war-journalism-and-moral-complexity/ "Civil War attests to Alex Garland’s fascinating ability to create impactful narratives that provoke deep discussions, beyond his unwavering commitment to the themes and characters at hand, without falling into preachy stances. A film that transcends political boundaries, focusing on war journalism, the moral dilemmas faced by those who risk their lives to tell stories that cannot be ignored, and the personal transformation necessary to carry out such an inhuman task. The character complexity and the chilling intensity of the cinematography and sound production contribute to a powerfully engaging, repeatedly shocking audiovisual experience. It’s a tribute to a profession often forgotten, but equally a challenge for viewers to reflect on critical issues in contemporary society." Rating: A-

r96sk
r96sk
★ 9

Terrific movie! <em>'Civil War'</em> is a blast from beginning to end, I enjoyed everything about it to be honest. It features an interesting story that is told with excellence. My biggest takeaway is the sound design, which is outstanding; literally from the first seconds post-BBFC black card. It is paced absolutely spot on, the end comes around so quick; probably because I was hooked. The cast do great jobs. Obvious credit to Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura and Stephen McKinley Henderson, they are all ace. Cailee Spaeny is my personal standout though, what an excellent showing from her! Engrossing viewing. Highly recommended. Very much want to rewatch it already.

CinemaSerf
CinemaSerf
★ 6

Nope, sorry, this just didn't work for me. It appears that there is a civil war amongst these United States. California and Texas have seceded from the Union and Florida seems to be having a wobble too. The President (Nick Offerman) makes a speech assuring the rest of his country that they've nothing to worry about, but hardened photo-journalist "Lee" (Kirsten Dunst) and her cohort "Joel" (Wagner Moura) reckon that the conflict is quite likely to come to an altogether different conclusion. They bravely decide to travel the 800-odd miles to Washington DC to try and interview him. Their out-of-shape veteran associate "Sammy" (Stephen McKinley Henderson) thinks they are mad, but also wants in on the trip. Meantime, the enthusiastic young photographer "Jessie" (Cailee Spaeny) has managed to hook up with the team and so, rather implausibly, they agree to take her on this perilous journey. It's that implausibility that carries the whole thing as the completely preposterous scenario unfolds before us. No effort is made to fill us in on the cause of this warfare. Did the President seize power? Was he elected from a party these states didn't vote for? Are they just brutal and well armed revolutionaries? Then we have the ridiculous dialogue - usually from Henderson with his "always take fuel when you can" or "this way only leads to death" type profundities as the group travel through a remarkably stable, well fuelled and provisioned, nation where there's hardly the merest hint of mass migrations, fear or terror. Indeed, their blue "Press" helmets and a little bit of kevlar seem to render them immune to the deadly drama that they are supposed to be experiencing. Jesse Plemons makes a brief appearance - that actually leads to the only vaguely exciting part of this chronology, but otherwise it's all a bit on a non-event. Dunst starts off as a strong and characterful woman but that dwindles away and, well, I was just a bit bored as the denouement hoved into view with all the predicability of the sun coming up. It's bitty, episodic, unrealistic and populated with characters in whom I simply could not believe. Sure, maybe it's supposed to be outlandishly apocalyptic, but it reminded me for the most part of an episode of "Falling Skies" - only without the aliens. Perhaps it might resonate better with an American audience? I'm not one of them and this didn't.

Brent Marchant
Brent Marchant
★ 8

Cautionary tales often have some of the most significant impact when brought to life on the big screen, and that’s certainly the case with the latest offering from writer-director Alex Garland. The filmmaker’s gripping tale of a quartet of journalists (Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Stephen McKinley Henderson, Cailee Spaeny) covering a civil war in a dystopian version of America of the near future follows the reporters as they make their way from New York to Washington via a circuitous route that shows them all sides of this nightmarish scenario. Essentially a road trip film, “Civil War” provides the principals and viewers with an array of images and situations graphically depicting what’s left of the US as a distraught population attempts to make sense of the circumstances and find ways to survive. The purpose of the protagonists’ journey is to secure an interview (likely the last one) with a corrupt, egomaniacal President (Nick Offerman) as rebel forces close in on the capital. They set out on this treacherous odyssey despite the dangers involved both in making the trip and in their roles as journalists, who are looked on with suspicion and have been accused of fanning the flames of the hostilities. While some have complained that the film doesn’t provide enough social and political background about the conflict, I submit that this consideration is fundamentally unnecessary: Garland is making an unadulterated statement here that, when the bullets start flying, ideology won’t matter and no one will care, a point driven home with chilling clarity over and over. The madness that consumes the population is all that’s important at that juncture, one driven by bald-faced hostility on steroids both among the combatants and the overzealousness of the reporters in seeking to “get the story,” no matter what. In achieving this end, the filmmaker holds nothing back, making this an often-difficult watch, one definitely not for the squeamish or faint of heart. But the picture’s message is one of grave importance, especially in today’s trying, polarized climate. We’d be wise to pay attention to what’s being said in this important work, handily the best – and most troubling – release of 2024 thus far.

edrddz
edrddz
★ 7

The film, although set in a context of armed conflict, deviates from the traditional war theme to focus on war photojournalists, promoting a perspective on the work of such professionals. Through a series of small scenes, the director seeks to compose a portrait of these professionals' actions on the battlefield without declaring the reasons for the war or identifying the sides involved. Each scene, individually, is well-executed, standing out for the quality of cinematography and an immersive sound work that amplifies the tension. However, these scenes, although effective individually, fail to come together cohesively. The result is a film that seems less than the sum of its parts. The main problem with the film is a lack of depth. Although technically well-produced, particularly in terms of audio, the film falls short of a deeper approach, which could have elevated it from a mere display of impactful scenes to a truly impactful work.

おすすめの作品