19世紀から24世紀まで、500年間の異なる時代を舞台とした6つのエピソード。一見関係性がないように思われるそれぞれの物語が、時を超えて複雑なつながりを見せる。
製作費: $102,000,000 (153億円)
興行収入: $130,482,868 (196億円)
推定収支: $28,482,868 (43億円)
※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。
監督: リリー・ウォシャウスキー / ラナ・ウォシャウスキー
脚本: ラナ・ウォシャウスキー / リリー・ウォシャウスキー / トム・ティクヴァ
音楽: Reinhold Heil / ジョニー・クリメック
制作: リリー・ウォシャウスキー / Grant Hill / ラナ・ウォシャウスキー
撮影監督: Frank Griebe / ジョン・トール
制作会社: Cloud Atlas Productions / Anarchos Productions / X Filme Creative Pool / A Company / Dreams of Dragon Pictures / Media Asia Film Production / Ascension Pictures / ARD Degeto
Interesting film with an exceptional cast, fantastic performances and characterizations. The story, though, is a bit difficult to follow and, in the end, seems to not have a real point.
Cloud Atlas was a very well made movie but unlike a lot of movies that try to tell simultaneous stories and then have them come together at the end, this one just didn't for me. I'm still unclear as to the point of it all. Another issue I had was a general feeling of goofiness. Sure, the Cavendish story was pure comedy but the rest of the stories just didn't feel serious enough to me. It carried my attention for the 172 minutes well enough and it was entertaining, I just expected more of a pay off at the end. All in all, it's definitely worth seeing but I still haven't made up my mind if I truly liked it or not. What did you think?
A not-easy-to-follow film, we are presented with sub-plots from several times and places, both past and future - in which the same characters seem to be involved. An interesting idea, good images but yu need to have a particular taste in movies in order to fully enjoy Cloud Atlas. I feel that the average audience may not be heavily impressed with they way it conveys its message - by going from one timeline to another and slowly building up all these sub-plots in parallel.
The true legacy of the Wachowskis, so close to pulling off the impossible that it is not wholly understandable in one viewing. The central theme is the idea of karma. Actions affecting our lives, not just in this life but through several incarnations. Thrown in is the idea of connectedness, no one really being independent but connected and dependant on others. The format through which these themes are worked are i believe 6 different times over three centuries. The same actors are used in their "same" roles in different time lines to give this understanding of "same" person ie reincarnation, the idea of a continuous soul. While this same actor trick works, ie helps us in understanding the roles, the immutable characters, each story is cut up and interwoven with the others. Thus the film follows six stories unfolding in parallel, all working the same themes, following similar arches. As i said in the beginning, it is trying the almost impossible, and it is very difficult to follow in the first 2-3 sittings (i'm beyond ten). But i would really encourage you to put in the time, because in the end it does work and the film achieves it's objective of carrying ideas that are at the edge of what can be expressed in words (try explaining karma to anyone who hasn't heard about it, if you doubt) In the end i think this is the true legacy of the Wachowskis. Matrix was off course fun, but to be honest the idea of living in a simulation world was just new, the delivery exiting, but eventually hot air. As an idea it really is not very solid and the Movie quite understandably does not work beyond the first, where "enlightenment" is achieved, and who can go beyond that in this mortal sphere. The idea of karma on the other hand is as good a one as humans every had and tried to put into words. It is of the keys to human existence and here worked in a very watch-able package.
