華麗なるギャツビー

華麗なるギャツビー

華麗なるギャツビー

“その名はギャツビー男の憧れ、女の理想その人生は━━【嘘(ミステリー)】”

20132h 22m★ 7.4ドラマロマンス

あらすじ

ニックが暮らす家の隣に建つ、ぜいを凝らした宮殿のような豪邸。ニックは、そこで毎晩のように盛大なパーティーを開く若き大富豪ジェイ・ギャツビーと言葉を交わす仲になる。どこからやって来たのか、いかにしてばく大な富を得たのか、なぜパーティーを開催し続けるのか、日を追うごとに彼への疑問を大きく膨らませていくニック。やがて、名家の出身ながらも身寄りがないこと、戦争でさまざまな勲章を受けたことなどを明かされるが、ニックはこの話に疑念を持つ。

作品考察・見どころ

バズ・ラーマン監督は、不朽の文学を狂騒と色彩が渦巻く極上の映像体験へと昇華させました。レオナルド・ディカプリオ演じるギャツビーの、脆さと気高さが共存する眼差しは圧巻です。現代的な音楽を融合させた大胆な演出は、夢に憑りつかれた男の孤独と熱狂を、時代を超えた鮮烈な生命力として私たちの心に直接突き刺します。原作の静謐な内省を、あえて過剰な視覚的スペクタクルへ転換した点に映像化の真髄があります。行間の虚飾と絶望が、豪華絢爛な舞台装置を通じて体感する悲劇へと変貌を遂げているのです。届かない光を追い続ける愚かなまでの純真さは、映画という魔法によって普遍的な愛の神話となり、観る者の魂を激しく揺さぶります。

原作・関連書籍

映画化された原作や関連書籍を読んで、映像との違いや独自の世界観を楽しみましょう。

興行成績

製作費: $105,000,000 (158億円)

興行収入: $351,040,419 (527億円)

推定収支: $246,040,419 (369億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

Andres Gomez

Andres Gomez

★ 2.5

Baz Luhrmann repeats what he did with Rome + Juliet and creates a horrible moster full of FX and exaggeration. Still, the cast performs well.

anthonyryan1

anthonyryan1

★ 8

An over the top portrayal of the classic novel, while at times excessive and tasteless, it truly hits home with the novels original critique on the excess of the time. The cast was **excellent**, the movie stayed true to the novel in all the most important ways. I personally feel the modern soundtrack wasn't appropriate in several cases, but a couple flawless executions.

GenerationofSwine

GenerationofSwine

★ 2

See I don't know how to review this because I came into it hating the novel, and it's 2022, it took me over a decade to finally say "fine I'll watch the movie." And unfortunately they didn't improve things. It's still, well, pretentious. It's still a story of someone that is living above his means, and living a very shallow life, that the audience is supposed to relate to enough to either like or dislike him... ... and I just never could. Holden Claufield was pretentious, but the magic of the Catcher in the Rye is that everyone could relate to him in some way, everyone could connect in some way, even if you ultimately didn't like him. Jay Gatsby, you can't really relate to him. The best description for him is a false prophet, at least the most apt description of him is a false prophet... and that isn't a relatable protagonist. That isn't the sort of character that most people can connect with. And it carried over into this film. It's hard to get into the novel when the protagonist is unrelatable, and just as hard to get into the film. But, at the same time, it's done beautifully and Leo did nail the part. In fact, all the acting was pretty great.

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

★ 7

To be fair to Baz Luhrmann, this is actually quite a difficult story to adapt for the big screen. On the face of it, there are many contradictions right from the start (not least that our relatively normal narrator - trader "Nick" (Tobey Maguire) lives next door to the eponymous and enigmatic millionaire (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his Disney-esque castle). The story is told by way of a retrospective during which the now depressed "Nick" regales his psychiatrist with his tales of life in the fast lane that offered him the opportunity to mix with the rich and famous at the very end of the 1920s through his new neighbour. Simultaneously, he must cope with the unhappy marriage between his cousin "Daisy" (Carey Mulligan) and her selfish, womanising, husband - of old wealth - "Tom" (Joel Edgerton). The film starkly contrasts the wealth and profligacy of the "Gatsby" existence with those of the poverty stricken working class reeling, still, from the impact of the Great Depression. The film looks beautiful. The costumes and the dancing, the cars, the jewellery and the houses (fancy and less so) all add richness to the story and the performances - especially from DiCaprio, Edgerton and to a lesser extent Jason Clarke are really quite good. Maguire and Mulligan less so and I found that unlike in many other of his films, the use of a contemporaneous soundtrack whilst all are clad in the Upstate NY finery didn't work so well for me. The book is an interesting character study looking at just about everything from wealth and privilege to prostitution and mental illness - and for the most part this stays on track. Easily the best cinema adaptation of a flawed book - and well worth watching.

kodkuce

kodkuce

★ 10

I thought that movie was some shitty old-school musical, but boy, I was wrong. A gem, must watch.