FindKey

FindKeyは、100万件を超える映画・ドラマ作品、そして数百万人の人物データと独自の16類型CTI診断を統合した、日本初の感情特化型映画レコメンドエンジンです。

Find (見つける) + Key (鍵・正解)

映画に限らず、人生のヒントを見つける場所です。

FindKeyについてロケ地 (試験中)利用規約プライバシーポリシーお問い合わせ
© 2026 Bennu Inc.TMDB Logo

本サービスはTMDB APIを利用していますが、TMDBによる推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。

マダム・ウェブ
マダム・ウェブ

マダム・ウェブ

“最悪の未来が見えた。なぜ私にだけー?”

20241h 57m★ 5.3アクションファンタジー
Netflix

あらすじ

アメリカ・ニューヨーク。救命士として懸命に働いていたキャシー・ウェヴ(ダコタ・ジョンソン)は、ある日、生死を彷徨う事故に遭い、それをきっかけに“未来予知”の能力を手にする。突如覚醒した能力に戸惑うキャシーだったが、未来を予知するだけでなく、自分の意思で未来を変えられる事が分かってくる。そんなある日、キャシーは偶然出会った3人の少女が、黒いマスクとスーツに身を包んだ謎の男に殺害される未来を見たことから、図らずもその男から少女たちを守ることに……。ある重要な秘密を持つとされる少女たちは一体何者なのか。そして、キャシーと同じく未来が見える黒いマスクとスーツの男は、どこからやって来たのか。やがて全ては、キャシー出生の秘密とともに、壮大な“運命”の糸で結びついてゆく……。

作品考察・見どころ

本作の真髄は、未来を「見る」だけでなく「変える」という心理サスペンスとしての緊迫感にあります。断片的な予知が視界を侵食する独創的な演出は、観客を主人公と同じ焦燥へ引き込み、知的な興奮を呼び起こします。ダコタ・ジョンソンの静謐な演技が超常的な力に生々しい重みを与え、彼女の眼差しを通じて描かれる運命の交錯が作品の核となっています。 知略を駆使して破滅を回避するプロセスは、従来の枠組みを超えた新鮮な魅力を放ちます。女性たちが未来を共有し、共助によって強さを獲得していく物語は、現代的な救済のあり方を提示しています。運命の糸を手繰り寄せるスリリングな映像体験は、あなたの鼓動を最後まで激しく打ち鳴らすことでしょう。

興行成績

製作費: $80,000,000 (120億円)

興行収入: $100,498,764 (151億円)

推定収支: $20,498,764 (31億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

予告・トレイラー

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

Netflix

レンタル・購入

U-NEXT
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies

キャスト

ダコタ・ジョンソン
ダコタ・ジョンソン
Cassandra Webb
シドニー・スウィーニー
シドニー・スウィーニー
Julia Cornwall
イザベラ・メルセード
イザベラ・メルセード
Anya Corazón
Celeste O'Connor
Celeste O'Connor
Mattie Franklin
タハール・ラヒム
タハール・ラヒム
Ezekiel Sims
Mike Epps
Mike Epps
O'Neil
エマ・ロバーツ
エマ・ロバーツ
Mary Parker
アダム・スコット
アダム・スコット
Ben Parker
ケリー・ビシェ
ケリー・ビシェ
Constance
Zosia Mamet
Zosia Mamet
Amaria

スタッフ・制作会社

監督: S.J. Clarkson

脚本: S.J. Clarkson / Claire Parker / Kerem Sanga

音楽: Johan Söderqvist

制作: Claire Parker / Adam Merims / Lorenzo di Bonaventura

撮影監督: Mauro Fiore

制作会社: Columbia Pictures / di Bonaventura Pictures

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

CinemaSerf
CinemaSerf
★ 5

We start off with an heavily pregnant woman deep in the Peruvian jungle looking for a very rare spider with her pal "Ezekiel" (Tahar Rahim). Guess what? Yep - she finds it, and almost immediately too! Anyway, it turns out that her pal isn't so friendly after all and pretty sharpish she is shot and face up in a pool of healing waters where her baby is being delivered by a jungle people with spidey-skills. Advance twenty-odd years and we meet paramedic "Cassie" (Dakota Johnson) who drives around with her partner "Ben" (Adam Scott), indifferently saving folks from disaster. It's one such disaster, though, that sees her tumbled deep into the river and having to be rescued by her buddy. This trauma appears to trigger something weird. She is getting flash-fronts. She can see the tiniest snippets of the future - and that doesn't usually bode well for anyone, including her! A trip on a train to a funeral proves decisive as three of the other passengers also feature in her dreams - all being the targets of a mysterious lycra-clad tunnel-climber bent on slaughter. Can she rescue them and find out just what's going on? Well possibly, but the story is just thin and the characters so undercooked that I didn't really care. The whole arachnid story line is under-developed to the point that I couldn't see what her skills really had to do with a spider at all. Tahar Rahim seemed uncertain if he was supposed to be "Deadpool" and/or Antonio Banderas and hats have to come off to Celeste O'Connor for playing the entirely obnoxious and attitudinal "Mattie" with quite such aplomb. The denouement is straight out of "Highlander" (1986) and I'm afraid that rather summed this up. Not an original bone in it's small and squidgy body, over-scripted and made for the sake of it. Sure, it's all about team bonding, trust and finding yourself (quite literally), but the readiness with which all concerned buy into this increasingly repetitive and whacky scenario is just daft. Like the whole multi-verse concept, the studios have decided to take super-hero films and flog them to death without worrying about concept, character or a decent story, and though Johnson does try to lift this where she can, it's ends up being something akin to one of those "Superman" television episodes we used to watch with Dean Cain - only with monotonous time-shifting!

r96sk
r96sk
★ 8

Ouch, that average rating! I'm not going to lie though, I genuinely had a fun time watching <em>'Madame Web'</em>... perhaps I should be keeping that fact quiet? I don't know what to say, I found it to be suitably entertaining. I'm sure there are plot holes aplenty (I noticed a few) and it probably makes zero sense/isn't a good adaptation compared to its source material or whatever but honesty... I don't care, it gave me enough enjoyment that I wasn't questioning anything about what I was watching. The cast are probably the key factors as to why I did enjoy this. I previously knew of Dakota Johnson but hadn't actually seen her in anything properly, I found her performance to be more than noteworthy and she spearheads the film strongly. The trio of Sydney Sweeney, Isabela Merced and Celeste O'Connor are positives too. Tahar Rahim's antagonist, meanwhile, is poorly written and portrayed, though I personally thought the actor did a good job. I have no complaints with anyone who appears onscreen to be honest. Away from them, the pacing and score are also standouts. In my recollection of viewing this, I truthfully haven't got any issues with it. If it wasn't for the slight bad murmurs that I did hear about pre-watch (though not much of it as I avoid as much as I can with movies) and the reaction on sites like this post-watch, I'd not be questioning my thoughts about this whatsoever. As I always say, to each their own. For me, gimme a sequel (as long as the cast remain, mind). Not even sorry.

Chandler Danier
Chandler Danier
★ 3

Wooooow. Worse than the Marvels. Why did they dance on the table for like 20 guys? Who chose those glasses? But I sure do want a crisp, refreshing Pepsi Cola. Deadly good taste.

jesseyu
jesseyu

Perhaps it was the perceived and preconceived notion that I had of this film being really bad as shown by its ratings scores from various sites, but I found this film actually really funny in a campy sort of way and better than decent in terms of not-big-budget superhero-film sort of way. In short, I came away enjoying it and unhappy with how this movie was portrayed in the movie-review media. I think it was just a piling on of the mob-mentality reviewers who tried to kick somebody who was already down, but anyway, I do hope this gets a sequel and I do hope the filmmakers continue with the campy, unintentionally funny, very quiet scenes with no theme music whatsoever style, low-budget-but-still-decent CGI, and over-all enjoyable moviemaking which can be watched and enjoyed for an hour and a half. A huge departure from those 3-hour self-important cinematic "spectacles" of today.

JPV852
JPV852
★ 4

Is Madame Web the worst superhero movie ever made? Not by a longshot as Superman IV, Batman & Robin and Supergirl would take a front seat in that department. Now the argument can be made it's the worst in the modern era of superhero movies, though personally it's "better" than Suicide Squad but even that one had costumed heroes in it versus MW which only had maybe a few minutes of the ladies in their costumes and even then, it's via future visions. Beyond that, nothing really works. The direction, even with the twisty-turny camera movements felt familiar as I'm pretty sure I've seen it done before but minimally. The performances from everyone was either bland, Dakota Johnson especially, or downright awful (Tahar Rahim), not helped by the stilted and oft atrocious dialogue from no less than four writers, two of which were responsible for Morbius. I didn't hate Madame Web more so that I found it downright dull and boring. There's no reason to watch this and with the terrible box office, the last line of "And you know the best thing about the future? It hasn't happened yet" is pretty poignant. **2.0/5**

おすすめの作品