Backdrop
ワン・プラス・ワン

ワン・プラス・ワン

19681h 55m6.3ドキュメンタリー音楽

Trailer

Overview

No synopsis available.

製作費: $500,000 (1億円)

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

U-NEXT

レンタル・購入

Amazon VideoApple TV StoreGoogle Play Movies

Cast

Reviews / 口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

口コミを読み込み中...

TMDB ユーザーの口コミ

CRCulver
CRCulver
6

Has a film ever combined one theme of such wide popular appeal with another that will interest only a small crowd and simply baffle that big popular audience? Jean-Luc Godard's <i>Sympathy for the Devil</i> would delight one set of viewers and infuriate another. How does one even give a star rating to this? In May 1968, Jean-Luc Godard was permitted to film the Rolling Stones over several days in a London studio as they gradually fleshed out their now classic song "Sympathy for the Devil", and so one might expect simply a documentary about a rock band's creative process. However, over the last year Godard had broken ties with conventional cinema (even in its zany French New Wave form) and was now interested in using film to agitate for the Maoist philosophy that he had latched onto as the Zeitgeist for this era. Consequently, hardly have we seen the Stones at work before Godard cuts to completely different footage centered around the reading of strident political texts. Over the course of the film we repeatedly go back and forth between the Rolling Stones in the studio and political shots: Black Panthers sitting around a junkyard and advocating revolution, a woman spray-painting Maoist slogans over London walls, a comic book shop as a metaphor for American imperialism, etc. Even if the juxtaposition is jarring and indeed rather silly, the Rolling Stones portion of the film is satisfying for fans of this music. The viewer gets a sense of how the song "Sympathy for the Devil" went from merely a product of Jagger's imagination that he has to teach Keith Richards to ultimately the ample rendition with conga and backing-vocals that was finally released. Probably unbeknownst to Godard himself at the time, the film also serves as a portrait of Brian Jones' breakdown only about a year before his death: he's sometimes present in the studio, but he just sits in the corner, neglected by his bandmates and strumming a guitar that isn't even miked. The rest of the Stones, however, are clearly enjoying themselves. It's amusing how Jagger's English working-class accent, itself quite fake, immediately shifts to an imitation of some old American bluesman as soon as the recording of each take starts; rarely have I got such a vivid sense of how much blues meant to this generation of English youth. The last shot of the band in the film, presumably after recording wrapped on "Sympathy of the Devil", is a longish jam session. Another delight of this film for music lovers is that we can see in full colour how recording studios looked in the 1960s with the technology and sound insulation strategies of that era. (Everyone's smoking constantly, too. The place must have smelled like an ashtray). What, then, of the political bits? These would weird out anyone not familiar with Godard's earlier work of the late 1960s, but if one watches his films chronologically, then there is a clear progression from WEEKEND, his last relatively conventional film: again we see a breakdown of 1960s consumerist society depicted through militants holding guns versus prostrate figures red with (intentionally very fake) blood. Anne Wiazemsky, who had acted in Godard's immediately preceding films as a symbol of rebellious youth and now the director's second wife, appears as the personification "Eve Democracy". Unable to answer anything to her interlocutor's questions but "Yes" or "No", she mocks what Godard saw as the impotency of bourgeois representative democracy, where the people have no other way to effect political change except to vote for or against a candidate, a process that happens only every few years even as the nation is confronted by pressing challenges. Godard's politics during this time were wonky and it's hard to tell just how seriously he believed in Maoism, or whether the 38-year-old director was just trying on a fad to be closer to the youth. And yet, for viewers interested in history and especially this turbulent decade, the political scenes too hold a lot of interest. In the comic book shop segment, the camera pans slowly across the shelves, presenting a variety of pulp literature and pornography that is utterly forgotten today. Didactic as the scenes of the Black Panthers and Eve Democracy might be, even they can be appreciated as a time capsule of 1960s fashion thanks to their colourfully dressed characters.

おすすめの作品

エグゼクティブ・デシジョン
2h 12m
6.3

エグゼクティブ・デシジョン

監督Stuart Baird
出演カート・ラッセル, スティーヴン・セガール, ハル・ベリー
1996映画
Titicut Follies
1h 24m
7.2

Titicut Follies

監督Frederick Wiseman
出演
1967映画
冬の旅
1h 45m
7.3

冬の旅

監督Agnès Varda
出演Sandrine Bonnaire, マーシャ・メリル, Yolande Moreau
1985映画
恋人のいる時間
1h 35m
6.9

恋人のいる時間

監督ジャン=リュック・ゴダール
出演マーシャ・メリル, Bernard Noël, フィリップ・ルロワ
1964映画
Kill the Irishman
1h 46m
6.8

Kill the Irishman

監督ジョナサン・ヘンズリー
出演レイ・スティーヴンソン, ヴィンセント・ドノフリオ, ヴァル・キルマー
2011映画
パッション
1h 27m
5.7

パッション

監督ジャン=リュック・ゴダール
出演Isabelle Huppert, ハンナ・シグラ, ミシェル・ピコリ
1982映画
ゴダールの探偵
1h 35m
5.2

ゴダールの探偵

監督ジャン=リュック・ゴダール
出演Laurent Terzieff, Aurelle Doazan, Jean-Pierre Léaud
1985映画
あたりまえの映画
1h 48m
6.7

あたりまえの映画

監督ジャン=リュック・ゴダール
出演
1968映画
A GHOST STORY ア・ゴースト・ストーリー
1h 33m
7.1

A GHOST STORY ア・ゴースト・ストーリー

監督David Lowery
出演ケイシー・アフレック, ルーニー・マーラ, McColm Cephas Jr.
2017映画
モンティ・パイソン・アンド・ホーリー・グレイル
1h 31m
7.8

モンティ・パイソン・アンド・ホーリー・グレイル

監督テリー・ギリアム
出演グレアム・チャップマン, ジョン・クリーズ, エリック・アイドル
1975映画
あなたは私の婿になる
1h 48m
7.2

あなたは私の婿になる

監督Anne Fletcher
出演サンドラ・ブロック, ライアン・レイノルズ, Malin Åkerman
2009映画
イングロリアス・バスターズ
2h 32m
8.2

イングロリアス・バスターズ

監督クエンティン・タランティーノ
出演ブラッド・ピット, メラニー・ロラン, クリストフ・ヴァルツ
2009映画