

未知への飛行/フェイル・セイフ
あらすじ
アメリカの軍事コンピュータが、誤ってソ連に対する核攻撃指令を発してしまう。命令を受けた爆撃機は直ちにモスクワへ向けて発進、帰還可能ポイント=フェイル・セイフを超えてしまう。ソ連側の迎撃部隊も、爆撃機を撃墜することができず、ついに全ての手段は失われる……。


アメリカの軍事コンピュータが、誤ってソ連に対する核攻撃指令を発してしまう。命令を受けた爆撃機は直ちにモスクワへ向けて発進、帰還可能ポイント=フェイル・セイフを超えてしまう。ソ連側の迎撃部隊も、爆撃機を撃墜することができず、ついに全ての手段は失われる……。
監督: Sidney Lumet
脚本: Walter Bernstein / Harvey Wheeler / Eugene Burdick
制作: Sidney Lumet / Charles H. Maguire / Max E. Youngstein
撮影監督: Gerald Hirschfeld
制作会社: Columbia Pictures
**Fail Safe (1964)** _Directed by Sidney Lumet_ Sidney Lumet's Fail Safe is one of the first Hollywood films to seriously propose that nuclear Armageddon could be brought about by system error. A technical malfunction sends American bombers to Moscow with orders to attack, and the President (Henry Fonda) must work desperately to stop catastrophe before it's too late. Based on a novel by Eugene Burdick and Harvey Wheeler, the screenplay is excellent, the tension relentless, the performances more than sufficient to create the desired effect. As far as nuclear war goes, we as a world apparently have not made any progress toward reducing the risk of suddenly and catastrophically wiping out most of Earth's population. If anything, it's now worse. More nations have nuclear weapons, command structures are more fragmented, and the possibility of miscalculation or accident has only multiplied. It is ironic that the movie hinges on a mechanical failure. Even now, politicians are talking about AI-controlled weapons, and we all know the safety rating of AI is not anywhere near 100%. We're rushing headlong into systems we don't fully understand, trusting machines to make decisions that could end civilization, convinced that technology will save us from the very problems technology creates. Fail Safe warned us sixty years ago that putting apocalyptic power into automated systems is insanity. We apparently weren't listening. Does this film hold up? Indeed it does. _Fail Safe_, like some others from Lumet, aged very well. The black-and-white cinematography, the claustrophobic sets, the faces in close-up sweating through impossible choices—all of it still works, still creates dread. Henry Fonda's President, calm and desperate simultaneously, remains one of the most convincing portraits of leadership under unimaginable pressure. Fail Safe is as urgent today as it was in 1964, maybe more so. We're still playing the same game with higher stakes and worse odds. We are staring at the choice between a "nuclear winter" or the apocalyptic world of _The Terminator_ series. When do we start listening?