FindKey

FindKeyは、100万件を超える映画・ドラマ作品、そして数百万人の人物データと独自の16類型CTI診断を統合した、日本初の感情特化型映画レコメンドエンジンです。

Find (見つける) + Key (鍵・正解)

映画に限らず、人生のヒントを見つける場所です。

FindKeyについてロケ地 (試験中)利用規約プライバシーポリシーお問い合わせ
© 2026 Bennu Inc.TMDB Logo

本サービスはTMDB APIを利用していますが、TMDBによる推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。

アントマン&ワスプ
アントマン&ワスプ

アントマン&ワスプ

“このふたり、小さくなるほど、強くなる。”

20181h 58m★ 6.9アクションアドベンチャーサイエンスフィクション
Disney Plus

あらすじ

元泥棒でバツイチのヒーロー、アントマンことスコット・ラングは、2年前にアベンジャーズの戦いに参加したことがきっかけで、今はFBIの監視下に置かれ自宅軟禁の日々を送っていた。あと3日で監視から解放されるという日、スコットの前にアントマンのスーツの開発者であるハンク・ピム博士と、博士の娘のホープ・ヴァン・ダインが現れ、2人が極秘に進めていたある計画に協力するよう要請されるが、博士の研究技術を狙う、壁をすり抜けるの謎の敵ゴーストが現れる。

作品考察・見どころ

本作の白眉は、ミクロとマクロが交錯する独創的な映像魔術にあります。日常の道具が武器へと瞬時に変貌する演出は、観客の空間認識を鮮やかに攪乱します。特にワスプによる流麗なアクションは、最小の世界から最大級の興奮を引き出す映像表現の極致を見せてくれます。 根底にあるのは家族の絆という普遍的なテーマです。ポール・ラッドが体現する等身大の父性は、宇宙規模の脅威とは異なる切実な感動を呼び起こします。量子力学とコメディが完璧に調和し、愛する者のために限界を超える人間の強さを情熱的に描き出した、心躍るエンターテインメントの傑作です。

興行成績

製作費: $140,000,000 (210億円)

興行収入: $622,674,139 (934億円)

推定収支: $482,674,139 (724億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

予告・トレイラー

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

Disney Plus

レンタル・購入

Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
FOD

キャスト

ポール・ラッド
ポール・ラッド
Scott Lang / Ant-Man
エヴァンジェリン・リリー
エヴァンジェリン・リリー
Hope Van Dyne / Wasp
マイケル・ダグラス
マイケル・ダグラス
Dr. Hank Pym
ハナ・ジョン=カーメン
ハナ・ジョン=カーメン
Ava / Ghost
ランドール・パーク
ランドール・パーク
Jimmy Woo
ミシェル・ファイファー
ミシェル・ファイファー
Janet Van Dyne / Wasp
ローレンス・フィッシュバーン
ローレンス・フィッシュバーン
Dr. Bill Foster
マイケル・ペーニャ
マイケル・ペーニャ
Luis
ウォルトン・ゴギンズ
ウォルトン・ゴギンズ
Sonny Burch
ボビー・カナヴェイル
ボビー・カナヴェイル
Paxton

スタッフ・制作会社

監督: Peyton Reed

脚本: Erik Sommers / Larry Lieber / ジャック・カービー

音楽: クリストフ・ベック

制作: ルイス・デスポジート / スタン・リー / Charles Newirth

撮影監督: ダンテ・スピノッティ

制作会社: Marvel Studios

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

Gimly
Gimly
★ 6

It's fun to see big stuff get real little and little stuff get real big, but _Ant-Man and the Wasp_ suffers the same problems of its predecessor, except this time with an added issue, one that effects many movies (and even more TV shows), the problem of "The entire movie didn't have to happen if people would just have had normal human conversations with one another". _Final rating:★★★ - I liked it. Would personally recommend you give it a go._

John Smith
John Smith
★ 7

Actually quite good! It's like a less-weird, but more fun version of a Deadpool - in the sense that it is both filled with action but also with fun acting. I recommend it for a Saturday evening. It is quite wholesome.

Per Gunnar Jonsson
Per Gunnar Jonsson
★ 5

I did indeed enjoy this movie…somewhat. However I cannot say that I was overly impressed. The story was okay. I would not expect a deep and thought provoking story from a super hero movie nor would I want it. It served as a decent enough vehicle for moving things forward. Most of the actors did a good enough job of the role they were given which in some cases was pretty much mission impossible given some of the overly silly characters in the movie. In particular I got tired of Luis almost before the first scenes he was in had finished. He was just so silly that you started to wonder what age the target audience was. Jimmy Woo was not far behind. I think this leads to my main gripe with the movie. I expected a super hero movie but what I got was a fairly lame comedy with super heroes in it. It was just too much comic elements in it for me. I could probably have liked it if the jokes were somewhat intelligent but, for me, they were not. They alternated between overly silly and stupid characters, slap-stick and simple fall-on-your ass jokes. What about the bad guy? Well, first off, there was not really a distinct bad guy but a hole bunch of them. Unfortunately none of them had any real bad guy charisma. I assume that Sonny was supposed to be the main bad guy and he certainly had enough evil lunatic air about him to fit that but again…too silly. Then we have the lame Jimmy Woo who was just annoying. The Ghost was probably the best one but then she was not really a bad guy was she? I did like most of the action and the special effects though. The playing around with shrinking and returning to normal size, or greater, was both cool and funny. This shrinking business is of course a difficult theme to work with from a science and logic point of view. For instance, if you shrink a car to the size of a toy car it still weighs like a full size one and you cannot just pick it up. And what about the lab popping up and down all the time? Why weren’t everything shaken to bits inside when they started to run around with it? And don’t get me started about electricity and plumbing. But then, in this kind of movie I would say just just have to turn off that part of your brain. It made for some cool scenes after all. I also did like that the story was more of a down to Earth story. No overall galactic plot, no snapping of fingers to make…well you know what. Okay, there was the post credit scenes which was a bit of an annoying tie in. Perhaps best of all though, I could not really feel much SJW or other form of politically correct preaching being showed down my throat. Today that is a great plus for any movie. So, to sum up, I did enjoy it but it was not great and I was indeed a little bit disappointed at the end.

tmdb44006625
tmdb44006625
★ 6

For fans of the first one, which includes me, Ant-Man and the Wasp is more of what you like. More heisting. More car chases. More Giant Man. More of the three wombats. More humour. More mediocre villains. More romance between Scott and Hope. More family bonding. And of course, more quantum realm. It's fun. It's light hearted. It works. That post credit scene though .... 😲

Louisa Moore - Screen Zealots
Louisa Moore - Screen Zealots

“Ant-Man and the Wasp” is a really weird Marvel movie. Like its pint-sized superhero, the film doesn’t quite fit in with the typical MCU big screen canon and is a laid back yet thoroughly forgettable entry into the fatigued superhero genre. The story doesn’t try to tie too much together (save for a mid-credits scene), there’s not an over-dependence on rambunctious CGI effects, and the attempts at humor feel oddly forced (I’d estimate only 30% of the jokes land successfully). Despite the lame title characters and the ever-likeable Paul Rudd‘s offhand charisma, this film gives the impression that it’s an average C student trying desperately to overcome underdog status and achieve a place on the honor roll. The best part of the film besides Rudd (he makes this one, just like every movie he’s cast in, impossible not to enjoy at least a little), are the special effects. Sure, they’re all computer generated, but they’re some of the most creative since 2016’s “Doctor Strange.” The worst part of the film is its contrived humor. It’s stiff, often cringe-worthy, and sticks out like a sore thumb as it grows increasingly desperate. The film’s multiple writers couldn’t have helped things, and the barrage of thoughtless, lazy jokes quickly wore me down. Also lacking is suspense and a viable antagonist. There’s the oddly disturbing Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen), a woman who is living in unbearable pain and appears to be a formidable foe for Ant-Man (Rudd), The Wasp (Evangeline Lilly), and Hank Pym (Michael Douglas). But then she suddenly finds her heart and the evil disappears. The same goes for Dr. Foster (Laurence Fishburne), a professor who also has a near immediate change of heart. The thin rescue mission premise of extracting Hank’s wife Janet (Michelle Pfeiffer) from the Quantum Realm after being trapped there for the last 30 years also means there’s not too much else to root for. The quantum rules change on a whim to fit the action sequences, with a sometimes shrinking and sometimes growing super suit. And cars. And buildings. The exposition dialogue is long-winded and repetitive, and the ill-advised “comic” relief from Michael Peña is not snarky enough to feel fresh or new (see “Thor: Ragnarok“). This is a shallow, pointless film that becomes an exhausting bore.

おすすめの作品