Backdrop
七人の侍

七人の侍

"これぞ日本映画の旗! 世界をゆるがせ映画史に驚異の文字を刻み込んだ黒澤巨篇!"

19543h 27m8.4アクションドラマ

Trailer

Overview

麦の刈入れが終わる頃。とある農村では野武士たちの襲来を前に恐怖におののいていた。百姓だけで闘っても勝ち目はないが、麦を盗られれば飢え死にしてしまう。百姓たちは野盗から村を守るため侍を雇うことを決断する。やがて、百姓たちは食べるのもままならない浪人たち7人を見つけ出し、彼らとともに野武士に対抗すべく立ち上がる……。

Director: 黒澤明

Writer: 小国英雄

Producer: 本木荘二郎

製作費: $2,000,000 (3億円)

興行収入: $105,000,000 (158億円)

純利益: $103,000,000 (155億円)

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

U-NEXT

レンタル・購入

Amazon VideoApple TV StoreGoogle Play Movies

Cast

Reviews / 口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

口コミを読み込み中...

TMDB ユーザーの口コミ

Andres Gomez
Andres Gomez
10

Fantastic movie with a great touch of reality.

Kenneth Blais
Kenneth Blais
10

At the top of my favorite films ever. Every time I watch it is see something new. Bandits steal peasants rice. Peasants hire ronin samurai to defend them. Great plot, pace and acting. Akira Kurasawa's best...perhaps.

Filipe Manuel Neto
Filipe Manuel Neto
6

**Maybe a little overrated, but there's no doubt that it's good.** Well, I have to start this text with a note that I believe is relevant to understand what I'm going to write: this was the first Japanese film that I remember seeing. I might even be forgetting something I've seen before, but I don't think so. Therefore, I'm not a good connoisseur of Japanese cinema, so I don't want my opinion to be taken with any authority that I don't crave. I know there are people who want that. I do not. I speak, as in any of my reviews, only through my mouth, from the height of my meager wisdom, without pretensions. I may be right about some things, wrong about others, but that's the most normal thing in the world. I decided to see this film because it was highly recommended and well regarded… everyone said it was a very good film, so I decided to see it for myself. I just finished it, and read a little about the film and its director, the famous Akira Kurosawa. The film is really a work that is above average, but it is not the kind of film that pleases everyone, and it seems to me to be a little overvalued, which results in damage. I say this because I felt, at various times, that the film failed to meet my expectations, as I am quite neutral, that is, I neither love this type of film nor feel repugnance in watching it. The script takes place, roughly, in the mid-16th century, when Japan was divided into feuds and kingdoms, and there were frequent internecine wars in which the samurai took part. Of course, in such an environment, it is the common people who sacrifice themselves, and the humblest have always been the most susceptible to abuse by the powerful. That's what we have here, with a rural village that is regularly looted and devastated by an armed band until it decides to hire a small group of wandering samurai to help defend it. They achieve this objective, and we are invited to see all the labors that occur in the preparation of the defense, and in the martial training of those peasants. I'm going to do it differently, and start by saying the aspects that seemed most positive to me. First, it seems to me that Kurosawa is really meticulous in the work he has done and has great affection and respect for his country's traditions and history. Otherwise, one would not understand the effort and money that were tied up in a film with such a historical and cultural load. To what extent did his taste for realism influence European cinema, or vice versa? I'm sure there are film students who have discussed this. What I can guarantee is the commitment to realism, visible, for example, in the extraordinary design of the sets and costumes, and in the static cinematography, very elegant and sharp. The script is quite solid, and gives us an extraordinarily credible story and very well-built and striking characters. I don't know the actors well, but I think Toshiro Mifune deserves applause for the commitment and work he has done here. He is an actor who naturally captures our attention and has a charisma that comes through effortlessly. On the negative side, however, we also have several aspects to point out, starting with the length of the film, with more than three and a half hours. I'm sorry to say, but I feel that the script didn't justify that much time, and that Kurosawa didn't work the pace well. With a more restricted edition, he would have managed to reduce the film, without much loss, to two hours, and make it less heavy and exhausting. We don't need to see every village debate or every military training shenanigans. I also didn't like the attempts at humor introduced in the film. They just weren't funny at all. The excessive predictability of the story told also turns out to be a defect. I also didn't like the virtual absence of a soundtrack. I've seen that in other films, and I've never been particularly fond of that stylistic device.

drystyx
drystyx
10

I must begin by saying I am a bit "attention deficit" and that I never thought I would like subtitles, but this film flows through its long length with such adventure that I don't see how anyone can keep from being entranced with every second. And it takes a lot to hold my interest. In case you haven't heard, this "magnificent seven samurai" so to speak, are enlisted one by one to aid a village beset by 40 bandits. What is often lost is that the story is really "Four villagers". Two are village elders (although not as old as the "grandpa" character they look to for advice). One, Manzo, represents the conservative element that in our era might be called "Republican", and the other, Mosuke, represents the liberal or "Democrat" policy. The other two are Yohei, a man full of fear who thinks Manzo's policies will protect him; and Rikiki, the boldest villager who is more in tune with Mosuke. Indeed, Rikiki might qualify as the "eighth samurai" as the film progresses. There are so many wonderful subplots and so muuch excitement even when there is no action, that there's never a dull moment. The samurai also have their ups and downs. Toshiro Mifune is not the leader, but he is the soul. He is much like Rikiki. There is humor throughout that is perfectly timed, and much tragedy. I think it is Kurosawa's masterpiece, and he is one of the most respected directors of all time.

Zak_Jaggs
Zak_Jaggs
10

Maybe the greatest movie of all-time. This film is an epic accomplishment of long-form storytelling, amazing performances, wonderful camera work and fantastic sets. As is typical of Kurosawa, this movie attacks the theme of greed and is very willing to critically examine the high-status classes, in this case the "honourable" samurai. The characters are likeable for the most and the performance from Toshiro Mifune is absolutely masterful and his character is a brilliantly comic tragic character. The action is very raw with mud and rain and chaos, which I appreciate. The pacing in the middle is ever so slightly slow but it really doesn't detract from this utterly brilliant masterpiece.

おすすめの作品

羅生門
1h 28m
8.0

羅生門

監督黒澤明
出演三船敏郎, 京マチ子, 志村喬
1950映画
用心棒
1h 50m
8.1

用心棒

監督黒澤明
出演三船敏郎, 仲代達矢, 司葉子
1961映画
生きる
2h 23m
8.3

生きる

監督黒澤明
出演志村喬, 田中春男, 金子信雄
1952映画
隠し砦の三悪人
2h 19m
8.0

隠し砦の三悪人

監督黒澤明
出演三船敏郎, 千秋実, 藤原釜足
1958映画
蜘蛛巣城
1h 50m
7.9

蜘蛛巣城

監督黒澤明
出演三船敏郎, 山田五十鈴, 志村喬
1957映画
天国と地獄
2h 23m
8.3

天国と地獄

監督黒澤明
出演三船敏郎, 仲代達矢, 香川京子
1963映画
乱
2h 43m
8.0

監督黒澤明
出演仲代達矢, 寺尾聰, 根津甚八
1985映画
ニュー・シネマ・パラダイス
2h 4m
8.4

ニュー・シネマ・パラダイス

監督ジュゼッペ・トルナトーレ
出演フィリップ・ノワレ, ジャック・ペラン, マルコ・レオナルディ
1988映画
グッドフェローズ
2h 25m
8.5

グッドフェローズ

監督マーティン・スコセッシ
出演ロバート・デ・ニーロ, レイ・リオッタ, ジョー・ペシ
1990映画
火垂るの墓
1h 28m
8.4

火垂るの墓

監督高畑勲
出演辰巳努, 白石綾乃, 志乃原良子
1988映画
影なき狙撃者
2h 6m
7.5

影なき狙撃者

監督John Frankenheimer
出演フランク・シナトラ, Laurence Harvey, Angela Lansbury
1962映画
デルス・ウザーラ
2h 21m
7.9

デルス・ウザーラ

監督黒澤明
出演Юрий Соломин, Максим Мунзук, Михаил Бычков
1975映画