Backdrop
ミスティック・リバー

ミスティック・リバー

"もうひとつの「スタンド・バイ・ミー」を見るために、あなたは大人になった。"

20032h 18m7.7スリラー犯罪ドラマ

Trailer

Overview

ジミー、デイブ、ショーンの3人の少年たちが路上で遊んでいると、警官を装った誘拐犯が現れデイブだけを連れ去り、監禁し陵辱する。それから25年後、ジミーの愛娘が殺害され、刑事となっショーンが捜査にあたり……。<3人の立場の違う男たちが少年時代、心に負った傷のために悲劇に巻き込まれていくサスペンス・タッチの人間ドラマ。監督として評価の高いクリント・イーストウッドの最新作。原作は全米でベストセラーとなったデニス・ルヘインの同名小説。主演の3人にショーン・ペン、ティム・ロビンス、ケヴィン・ベーコンを迎え、タイプの違う役を熱演。ローレンス・フィッシュバーンやマーシャ・ゲイ・ハーデンらが脇固める。それぞれに子供の頃に負った心の傷が、25年の時を経てからどのように影響しているか、3人の冴えた演技を要チェック。>

製作費: $25,000,000 (38億円)

興行収入: $156,800,000 (235億円)

純利益: $131,800,000 (198億円)

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

HuluU-NEXTHBO Max on U-Next

レンタル・購入

Amazon VideoApple TV StoreGoogle Play Movies

Cast

Reviews / 口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

口コミを読み込み中...

TMDB ユーザーの口コミ

Wuchak
Wuchak
9

***Evils of the past and the problems with vigilante justice*** Released in 2003 and directed by Clint Eastwood, “Mystic River” tells the story of three men from a working class neighborhood in Boston. While playing in the street as kids, one of them is abducted and sexually abused for days. As adults they’ve drifted apart. Jimmy (Sean Penn) is a reformed con who runs a successful market when his daughter is suddenly murdered (Emmy Rossum). Sean (Kevin Bacon) investigates the murder with his partner, Whitey (Laurence Fishburne), with evidence eventually pointing toward Dave (Timothy Bottoms), the one who was abducted. Marcia Gay Harden plays Dave’s anxious spouse while Laura Linney plays Jimmy’s loyal wife. This is similar in tone & theme to the melancholy “Sleepers” (1996), but less episodic and more dramatically gripping. The movie has the confidence to take its time and flesh-out the characters. It’s a psychological crime drama that works as both a whodunit and a tragedy. The intrinsic problems of vigilante justice are cogently illustrated. Some people have misinterpreted the movie because they missed some things. For instance, they criticize the curious Lady Macbeth-like monologue of Annabeth (Linney) at the end. But watch the movie again, pay close attention, and the answers are there. I’d say more, but I don’t want to give anything away (you’re welcome to write me if you’d like some insights). “Mystic River” is not something that can be casually watched; it’s a deep drama with three-dimensional characters, potently exploring several intriguing issues: How abuses of the past affect the present; the danger of hiding recesses of your psyche; the folly of not getting spiritual help for deep-rooted psychological concerns; disloyalty/loyalty; doing the wrong thing for the right reasons; jumping to wrong conclusions based on dubious info; houses divided cannot stand; the importance of encouraging one’s spouse for the sake of familial health & survival; “king of the castle”; etc. The film runs 2 hours, 18 minutes and was shot in Boston. GRADE: A

The Movie Diorama
The Movie Diorama
8

Mystic River continuously outflows its poignant crime investigation through a meticulously gritty screenplay. The past haunts us. Experiences and encounters, grossly susceptible and an impressionably young age, returning viciously with psychological detriments. A naive boy that just didn’t know any better. Abducted. An unresolved mystery that manifested itself into an intricately societal Massachusetts neighbourhood, where one disturbance can erupt into a multitude of hatred from the cold concrete beneath them. A father’s daughter mercilessly murdered in the streets that he, and his two ex-friends, played hockey in. Anguish. Guilt. Vengeance. His childhood pals, one assigned the task of searching for the killer and the other forced into battling his own justifications for not murdering her, sending their condolences to the grieving father. Yet, Mystic River refuses to tell a simple crime drama. Eastwood, with his insatiably concise attention to the screenplay, elevated the mystery by providing an illustration of emotive complexity. One that many inflict upon themselves. Torment. These three individuals, with one visibly undergoing traumatic bewilderment, exhume indications of self-torment. Mystic River does not flow water. The elaborate dialogue is too viscous for the aqueous substance. Rather, it flows blood. Bacon’s detective role combating his duties as a justice seeker, that with the liabilities of adolescent friendship. Determining the fate of neighbours within his hands. Robbins’ psychologically damaged husband role, fabricating stories to protect his moral high ground. And Penn’s award-winning performance as the father, embroiled in a plethora of intense emotions that express the full journey of bereavement. As separate souls, these three give life to Helgeland’s script that, whilst frequently becomes overwrought with unnecessary conversations that repeat earlier information, undeniably captivates with its foundational strength in investigation building. Eastwood takes a differing approach. Instead of the classic yet saturated “who dunnit!?” narrative structure, he settled for displaying the mechanisms of detective fieldwork. Composing a timeline but questioning witnesses and suspects. Revisiting evidence to accurately imagine the murder as it happened. See, Mystic River works not for its “twists” and “turns” so to speak, but for its richly developed characters and constant focus on the investigation itself. The sensational performances, acute direction and gritty aesthetics provide the script with leverage. It exposes the rawness of the situation beautifully. Not to mention the exquisite pacing that made two and half hours flow by quicker than a hockey stick crashing down a raging waterfall. The conclusion should’ve been tighter, with Eastwood diminishing much of the staying power by unnecessarily extending its resolution. By simply ending on Jimmy and Sean coming to terms with what’s just happened, it enables the shock of its ending to simmer much more violently than Linney exclaiming how everyone else is weak compared to her and her husband. So whilst not perfect, Eastwood adapts Lehane’s novel with a sense of emotional urgency. Once the grit settles in, it never lets up, taking you on a roaring ride down a river of torment.

r96sk
r96sk
9

Excellent! I'm not fully sold on the ending, though it isn't anything less than good either way, but the rest of <em>'Mystic River'</em> is quality. The cast are superb, whether that be the main trio of Sean Penn, Tim Robbins and Kevin Bacon or the supporting Laurence Fishburne and Marcia Gay Harden. Bacon and Fishburne make for a terrific buddy cop duo, miles better than director Clint Eastwood's attempt with Charlie Sheen in the former's 1990 release <em>'<a href="https://letterboxd.com/film/the-rookie/" rel="nofollow">The Rookie</a>'</em>. The conclusion does I guess go in line with what precedes it, particularly with Robbins' character, but I'm not fully convinced by who is eventually unveiled as you know what. That's not to say it's a bad end, as noted at the top, as it's still entertaining no matter what.

おすすめの作品

インソムニア
1h 58m
7.0

インソムニア

監督クリストファー・ノーラン
出演アル・パチーノ, ロビン・ウィリアムズ, ヒラリー・スワンク
2002映画
チェンジリング
2h 21m
7.6

チェンジリング

監督クリント・イーストウッド
出演アンジェリーナ・ジョリー, ジョン・マルコヴィッチ, ジェフリー・ドノヴァン
2008映画
21グラム
2h 4m
7.3

21グラム

監督アレハンドロ・ゴンサレス・イニャリトゥ
出演ショーン・ペン, ナオミ・ワッツ, ベニチオ・デル・トロ
2003映画
ボーン・コレクター
1h 58m
6.8

ボーン・コレクター

監督フィリップ・ノイス
出演デンゼル・ワシントン, アンジェリーナ・ジョリー, Queen Latifah
1999映画
インビクタス/負けざる者たち
2h 14m
7.2

インビクタス/負けざる者たち

監督クリント・イーストウッド
出演モーガン・フリーマン, マット・デイモン, Tony Kgoroge
2009映画
メメント
1h 53m
8.2

メメント

監督クリストファー・ノーラン
出演ガイ・ピアース, キャリー=アン・モス, ジョー・パントリアーノ
2000映画
ミラーズ・クロッシング
1h 55m
7.4

ミラーズ・クロッシング

監督ジョエル・コーエン
出演ガブリエル・バーン, Marcia Gay Harden, ジョン・タトゥーロ
1990映画
ゲーム
2h 9m
7.6

ゲーム

監督デヴィッド・フィンチャー
出演マイケル・ダグラス, ショーン・ペン, Deborah Kara Unger
1997映画
許されざる者
2h 10m
7.9

許されざる者

監督クリント・イーストウッド
出演クリント・イーストウッド, ジーン・ハックマン, モーガン・フリーマン
1992映画
ドニー・ダーコ
1h 54m
7.8

ドニー・ダーコ

監督リチャード・ケリー
出演ジェイク・ジレンホール, ジェナ・マローン, James Duval
2001映画
スペース カウボーイ
2h 10m
6.4

スペース カウボーイ

監督クリント・イーストウッド
出演クリント・イーストウッド, トミー・リー・ジョーンズ, ドナルド・サザーランド
2000映画
ブラッド・ワーク
1h 50m
6.2

ブラッド・ワーク

監督クリント・イーストウッド
出演クリント・イーストウッド, ジェフ・ダニエルズ, アンジェリカ・ヒューストン
2002映画
ミスティック・リバー (2003) | FindKey