FindKey

FindKeyは、100万件を超える映画・ドラマ作品、そして数百万人の人物データと独自の16類型CTI診断を統合した、日本初の感情特化型映画レコメンドエンジンです。

Find (見つける) + Key (鍵・正解)

映画に限らず、人生のヒントを見つける場所です。

FindKeyについてロケ地 (試験中)利用規約プライバシーポリシーお問い合わせ
© 2026 Bennu Inc.TMDB Logo

本サービスはTMDB APIを利用していますが、TMDBによる推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。

サイン
サイン

サイン

20021h 46m★ 6.7スリラーサイエンスフィクションホラー

あらすじ

牧師だったグラハムは妻の事故死を境に牧師をやめ、弟のメリル、そして二人の子供達と静かに暮らしていた。しかしその家族の前に様々な兆候(サイン)が現れる。愛犬の暴走、畑に出現したミステリーサークル、家の周りに出没する姿の見えない謎の存在。そしてサインは世界各地に現れるようになった。はたしてサインは何を意味するのか。

作品考察・見どころ

M・ナイト・シャマラン監督の「サイン」は、SFスリラーの形を借りて「信仰の回復」という精神的なテーマを深く掘り下げた傑作です。地球規模の異変をあえて農家の一家に絞り込んで描くことで、逃げ場のない閉塞感と静寂に潜む恐怖を巧みに演出しています。メル・ギブソンが見せる静かな絶望と、ホアキン・フェニックスの熱演が、物語に深い人間味と説得力を与えています。 本作の真髄は、世界を「ただの偶然」と見るか「何者かの導き」と見るかという究極の問いにあります。終盤、劇中に散りばめられた一見無意味な伏線が鮮やかに収束する瞬間は、単なる謎解きを超え、生きる意味を再定義するような強烈なカタルシスをもたらします。目に見える兆候の裏側に隠された、家族の再生と奇跡の肯定こそが、今なお色褪せない本作の圧倒的な魅力です。

興行成績

製作費: $72,000,000 (108億円)

興行収入: $408,200,000 (612億円)

推定収支: $336,200,000 (504億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

Amazon Prime Video
Disney Plus
Amazon Prime Video with Ads

予告・トレイラー

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

Amazon Prime Video
Disney Plus
Amazon Prime Video with Ads

レンタル・購入

Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
FOD

キャスト

メル・ギブソン
メル・ギブソン
Graham Hess
ホアキン・フェニックス
ホアキン・フェニックス
Merrill Hess
Rory Culkin
Rory Culkin
Morgan Hess
アビゲイル・ブレスリン
アビゲイル・ブレスリン
Bo Hess
Cherry Jones
Cherry Jones
Officer Paski
M・ナイト・シャマラン
M・ナイト・シャマラン
Ray Reddy
Patricia Kalember
Patricia Kalember
Colleen Hess
Ted Sutton
Ted Sutton
SFC Cunningham
Merritt Wever
Merritt Wever
Tracey Abernathy
Lanny Flaherty
Lanny Flaherty
Mr. Nathan

スタッフ・制作会社

監督: M・ナイト・シャマラン

脚本: M・ナイト・シャマラン

音楽: James Newton Howard

制作: M・ナイト・シャマラン / Sam Mercer / フランク・マーシャル

撮影監督: Tak Fujimoto

制作会社: Touchstone Pictures / Blinding Edge Pictures / The Kennedy/Marshall Company

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

Wuchak
Wuchak
★ 7

_**Is it really about aliens?**_ M. Night Shyamalan's "Signs" (2002) is about a disillusioned ex-minister (Mel Gibson) who lives in the country with his son & daughter and brother (Juaquin Phoenix). The reasons for his disillusionment become clear as the story unfolds. When a mysterious crop circle is discovered in their cornfield they wonder if it's a prank or an alien invasion! Although the plot deals with a possible alien invasion, the theme is faith. There are two general views of life: (1) That life and the universe are one big meaningless accident and you're just an insignificant bug that will soon be squashed out of existence and memory. And (2) that there's an intelligent design to the universe and, although it's somehow fallen (i.e. severely messed up), there IS meaning, love, hope and purpose, even if we are presently unable to fully comprehend it. The film addresses the clash of these two opposing views. We've all experienced the conflict of these two positions within our OWN hearts; it's the clash of flesh (id) and spirit (super-ego). On the one hand, we WANT to believe the latter position, but life dishes out so much crap that we are seriously tempted to give-in to the former. This is the struggle Gibson's character faces in the story. He's given up on God and is stumbling in the dark; he's just going through the motions to exist. His smile is mostly a facade. Many people diss the film for an obvious plot hole regarding the alien's weakness, but Shyamalan's too talented to not realize this. It's a sign to what the film is really about (sorry; I couldn't resist). **SPOILER ALERT** (Don't read further unless you've seen the film) It's possible that the aliens aren't really extraterrestrials but rather demons from the underworld (the dark dimension) invading the physical realm to take as many victims as they can. The idea that they are aliens is just a mass deception and, remember, the devil is the "father of lies". There are many clues: The spaceships are never seen, just lights in the sky (the devil's also called "the prince of the power of the air" in the bible). The "aliens" look decidedly demonic and have cloven hoofs. The “primitive method” of repelling the aliens is discovered in “three cities the Middle East” and is holy water, which is ordinarily used by Catholic & Episcopal exorcists against demonic manifestations (Shyamalan, by the way, attended Catholic & Episcopal schools). The daughter, Bo, was said to be a "gift from God" who is sensitive to impure (unholy) water. Her name in Old Norse means "to live" and she was able to discern the weapon of life needed to defeat the demonic menace. The dog and bird were clearly possessed. The crop circles are occultic symbols and possible portals to the underworld. The crop circle in the Hess cornfield resembles a pitchfork. When the disillusioned minister cries out to God that he hates him he actually displays his faith; after all, he has to believe in God in order to converse. At that precise moment his son recovers from the asthma attack and the news announcer declares that the "aliens" are retreating. You see, FAITH sends the enemy fleeing with their tails between their legs. Also, we see evidence that the demons are personal in nature. The "alien" locked in the vet's pantry was linked to the guilt and disillusionment that haunted the vet and the minister after the death of the latter's wife. Also, we see evidence that the demons are personal in nature. The "alien" locked in the vet's pantry was linked to the guilt and disillusionment that haunted the vet after the death of the minister's wife. Keep in mind that when the film debuted, Shyamalan was known as the king of the plot twist, yet the revelation that the aliens’ weakness is water wasn’t exactly a mind-blowing turn seeing as how the earth is 71% water and technologically advanced aliens who can travel the galaxy would know this. Moreover, the aliens curiously have no physical weapons and are easily trapped by a pantry door. It stands to reason that Shyamalan hid the twist in the movie. That twist is that the aliens are really demonic in nature. I'm not saying you can't view the movie as a literal extra-terrestrial invasion flick, but rather that the underlying demonic reading is a legitimate way of viewing the material because it all ties together and links to the story arc of the disillusioned ex-minister finding redemption. Also, I'm not suggesting that you have to believe in God to appreciate this movie, which is obviously not the case. BOTTOM LINE: This is a quality Shyamalan film and is about on par with "The Sixth Sense" and "The Village.” The film runs 106 minutes and was shot in Eastern Pennsylvania. GRADE: B+

tmdb15435519
tmdb15435519
★ 7

Not my favorite M. Night Shyamalan film. Also not my least favorite...

CinemaSerf
CinemaSerf
★ 6

It's barely over an hour and a half this film, but it seems much longer. Mel Gibson ("Graham") is a widowed former pastor who lives on a farm with his two kids "Morgan" (Rory Culkin) and "Bo" (Abigail Breslin) and his brother "Merrill" (Joaquin Phoenix). Their lives are all rolling along normally until one morning they discover some crop circles amongst the corn fields. Dismissing them as hoaxes, they are intrigued when television reports suggest a proliferation of these things all around the world. Now add to their now heightened suspicions some late night noises and mysterious happenings, and the family begin to suspect that they are being watched - and that their observer is not exactly benign. The last ten minutes or so redeem this story to a degree, but for the most part it is a terribly slow burn of a film. There isn't really much by way of action; Gibson and Phoenix don't really exude much of a compelling sibling relationship and the kids - usually a crucial conduit for M. Night Shyamalan stories have much less to work with here. This has more of the melodrama to it - the backstory of tragedy and grief all gets in the way of the gradually increasing sense of menace and I found the whole momentum of the story quite staccato. This is an adequate film, but it is definitely nobody's best work.

tmdb93836550
tmdb93836550
★ 9

This is one of my favourite films ever and a top 2 spot for my favourite thrillers. Signs isn't you're average Alien film, it focuses solely on a widowed reverend and his family but it is still one of the best films ever made and one you can watch over and over and it never bores.

RalphRahal
RalphRahal
★ 7

Rewatching M. Night Shyamalan's Signs brought back the same feelings I had the first time I saw it. The script is solid, the plot is engaging, and the acting, especially from Mel Gibson, is strong. Joaquin Phoenix adds a lot to the movie too, balancing emotional moments with some light humor. But even with all these positives, the movie still feels like it’s missing something—a spark that could’ve made it truly great. The story is told entirely from the family’s perspective, which creates a lot of suspense and intimacy. However, it also leaves the aliens feeling underdeveloped. We never learn much about their intentions, behavior, or even why they’re invading Earth. That final scene with the alien and the child is particularly intriguing. Some theories suggest it wasn’t attacking but might actually have been saving the boy. The alien didn’t defend itself when Joaquin Phoenix’s character hit it, which raises questions about its true motives. This ambiguity adds an interesting layer but also feels like a missed opportunity for the story to dig deeper. Overall, Signs is a well-made movie with strong themes of faith, family, and survival.

おすすめの作品