FindKey

FindKeyは、100万件を超える映画・ドラマ作品、そして数百万人の人物データと独自の16類型CTI診断を統合した、日本初の感情特化型映画レコメンドエンジンです。

Find (見つける) + Key (鍵・正解)

映画に限らず、人生のヒントを見つける場所です。

FindKeyについてロケ地 (試験中)利用規約プライバシーポリシーお問い合わせ
© 2026 Bennu Inc.TMDB Logo

本サービスはTMDB APIを利用していますが、TMDBによる推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。

エルム街の悪夢
エルム街の悪夢

エルム街の悪夢

20101h 35m★ 5.5ホラー謎スリラー

あらすじ

夢の中から人々を襲う殺人鬼フレディ・クルーガーの殺戮を描く同名人気ホラーシリーズの第1作をマイケル・ベイ製作、ジャッキー・アール・ヘイリー主演でリメイク。エルム街に住む高校生のナンシー、クリスらは鉄の爪を持つ男に襲われる悪夢に毎晩うなされていた。そんな中、同じ悪夢にうなされていた仲間のひとりが現実に殺害され……。監督は、これまでにメタリカやグリーンデイなどのPVを手掛けてきたサミュエル・ベイヤー。

作品考察・見どころ

本作は、悪夢と現実の境界が瓦解する恐怖を最新の映像技術で突き詰めた野心作です。ジャッキー・アール・ヘイリー演じるフレディは、拭い去れない原罪の象徴として圧倒的な威圧感を放ちます。不意に訪れる「マイクロ・ナップ」の演出は、観客をも逃げ場のない睡魔の地獄へと引きずり込み、息もつかせぬ緊張感を持続させます。 ルーニー・マーラの繊細な演技が、絶望の中で立ち上がる人間の強さを際立たせ、映像でしか表現し得ない色彩設計が夢の不条理を見事に可視化しました。単なるホラーの枠を超え、逃れられない過去と対峙する勇気を描いた本作は、あなたの深層心理を激しく揺さぶる、忘れがたい衝撃を刻み込むことでしょう。

興行成績

製作費: $35,000,000 (53億円)

興行収入: $115,665,418 (173億円)

推定収支: $80,665,418 (121億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

U-NEXT
HBO Max on U-Next

予告・トレイラー

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

U-NEXT
HBO Max on U-Next

レンタル・購入

Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
FOD

キャスト

ルーニー・マーラ
ルーニー・マーラ
Nancy Holbrook
カイル・ガルナー
カイル・ガルナー
Quentin Smith
ジャッキー・アール・ヘイリー
ジャッキー・アール・ヘイリー
Freddy Krueger
Katie Cassidy
Katie Cassidy
Kris Fowles
Thomas Dekker
Thomas Dekker
Jesse Braun
ケラン・ラッツ
ケラン・ラッツ
Dean Russell
クランシー・ブラウン
クランシー・ブラウン
Alan Smith
コニー・ブリットン
コニー・ブリットン
Dr. Gwen Holbrook
Lia D. Mortensen
Lia D. Mortensen
Nora Fowles
No Image
Julianna Damm
Little Kris

スタッフ・制作会社

監督: サミュエル・ベイヤー

脚本: ウェズリー・ストリック / ウェス・クレイヴン / Eric Heisserer

音楽: スティーブ・ジャブロンスキー

制作: Brad Fuller / マイケル・ベイ / アンドルー・フォーム

撮影監督: ジェフ・カッター

制作会社: Platinum Dunes / New Line Cinema

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

RottenPop
RottenPop
★ 3

This is a pretty movie. Its apparent from the start, that this remake of the 1984 classic, has a pretty good sized budget to work with. In fact the budget for this incarnation was $35 Million according to Wikipedia. The budget for the Wes Craven original, $1.8 Million. You don't always get a better movie if your budget is huge, look at Avatar. You just get a really pretty movie that looks polished and has flawless special effects. Again, see Avatar. That movie was nothing but flash. The story is unoriginal and weak... and don't try coming at me with this whole "Shut up man! Avatar proved itself!" shut up! The larger budget in this case makes the movie look too polished to be takes seriously. Why the hell are we caring about watching clones of the Twilight teens being chased by Freddy Kruger? Were not. This movie didn't need a budget of $35 Million. It feels wasted. Some of the appeal of the original came from watching the director be a director and figure scenes out. This movie didn't do that. It felt trite and forced. Freddy Kruger is less of a movie villain in the horror industry and more of an icon. Everyone I knew growing up all had Freddy Kruger nightmares when they were a kid. Perhaps this new version of Freddy will serve to scare the shit out of kids these days. I would hope so. Maybe when they remake this movie again in twenty years they will bitch about it then as well. Who knows.

Wuchak
Wuchak
★ 6

***A more realistic and morose version of the original film & franchise*** The specter of a dead pedophile fatally haunts the dreams of the children of his self-appointed executioners who burned him to death years earlier. Released in 2010, this is a reboot of the original 1984 movie, freely throwing in elements from other flicks in the franchise. I think Jackie Earle Haley works well as creepy Freddy Krueger and I like the more realistic tone, which some say makes movie bland and boring. Rooney Mara (Nancy) and Kyle Gallner (Quentin) are decent as the main protagonists and I think the bedroom scene is superior to the same attack scene in the original; it’s more shocking. The prison scene’s great too. Unfortunately, the concept of Freddy is a bit of a mess. For instance, his bladed-glove is never explained. And what was the point of the boiler room since he was just a gardener at a small preschool? The filmmakers just threw in these elements because it's Freddy, figuring people knew the character. But how do these components fit into THIS movie? And what about viewers who never saw the original flicks? The film runs 1 hours, 35 minutes and was shot in northern Illinois and nearby Gary, Indiana, with reshoots done in Los Angeles. GRADE: B-/C+

Andre Gonzales
Andre Gonzales
★ 7

I really liked this new nightmare. I wish there was more action in it but still pretty good. I hope this is the start of a new Freddy movie series.

tmdb97554867
tmdb97554867
★ 10

**Unfairly Misunderstood Masterpiece.** I cannot express how unfairly judged and misunderstood this remake is. Instead of being another Elm Street sequel with the sole purpose of creative kills, jokes, unnecessary characters, and lazy revelations. The filmmakers decided to take a risky creative decision by reinterpreting Wes Craven's original ideas and retelling the story with a much more realistic tone. The dream sequences are more symbolic and atmospheric. The story explores real-life portrayals of teens dealing with childhood trauma that has been repressed into adulthood. You get to witness their confusion, coping mechanisms, and strained relationships with their parents. The kills are more grounded and eerily reminiscent of suicides or tragic accidents. Freddy himself is given a proper origin, motive, and personality that isn't just a bunch of plastered-on sequel lore. You witness Freddy's transformation from a pathetic loser with a dark fantasy to the dream demon that has no restrictions. I love the original and even gave it a 5/5, but this remake even surpasses that. I think many people might enjoy it far more if they truly gave it a chance.

おすすめの作品