FindKey

FindKeyは、100万件を超える映画・ドラマ作品、そして数百万人の人物データと独自の16類型CTI診断を統合した、日本初の感情特化型映画レコメンドエンジンです。

Find (見つける) + Key (鍵・正解)

映画に限らず、人生のヒントを見つける場所です。

FindKeyについてロケ地 (試験中)利用規約プライバシーポリシーお問い合わせ
© 2026 Bennu Inc.TMDB Logo

本サービスはTMDB APIを利用していますが、TMDBによる推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。

クラークス
クラークス

クラークス

19941h 32m★ 7.4コメディ

あらすじ

No synopsis available.

作品考察・見どころ

モノクロームの粒子が刻むのは、不毛で愛おしい「退屈」の真髄です。低予算ゆえの粗削りな映像美が、コンビニという閉鎖空間を一種の聖域へと昇華させています。マシンガンのように繰り出される下世話で知的なダイアローグは、映画における言葉の力を再認識させ、観る者の日常を鮮やかにハックする破壊的な魅力を放っています。 本作の核心は、何者にもなれない焦燥感と、それを受け入れる潔さの共存にあります。キャスト陣の等身大の演技が、出口のない日常を生きる魂を代弁し、冷笑的なユーモアの裏側に深い人間愛を滲ませます。映画製作の純粋な情熱が既成概念を打ち破った、独立映画界の伝説的な熱量にぜひ圧倒されてください。

興行成績

製作費: $27,575 (0億円)

興行収入: $3,151,130 (5億円)

推定収支: $3,123,555 (5億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

予告・トレイラー

配信サービス

レンタル・購入

Amazon Video
Apple TV Store

キャスト

Brian O'Halloran
Brian O'Halloran
Dante
Jeff Anderson
Jeff Anderson
Randal
Marilyn Ghigliotti
Marilyn Ghigliotti
Veronica
Lisa Spoonauer
Lisa Spoonauer
Caitlin
Jason Mewes
Jason Mewes
Jay
Kevin Smith
Kevin Smith
Silent Bob
Scott Mosier
Scott Mosier
William the Idiot Manchild / Angry Hockey-Playing Customer / Angry Mourner
Scott Schiaffo
Scott Schiaffo
Chewlie's Rep
No Image
Al Berkowitz
Old Man
Walt Flanagan
Walt Flanagan
Woolen Cap Smoker / Egg Man / Offended Customer / Cat-Admiring Bitter Customer

スタッフ・制作会社

監督: Kevin Smith

脚本: Kevin Smith

制作: Kevin Smith / Scott Mosier

撮影監督: David Klein

制作会社: View Askew Productions / Miramax

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

talisencrw
talisencrw
★ 9

Over the years, I have really enjoyed Smith's comic book writing, but this is the only film so far I have seen him direct. My cinephilic friends tend to dismiss his recent works, but this was very enjoyable. I like the influence he has had on independent cinema. 1994 certainly proved to be an important year for it, with the smash successes that independent studios had with 'Clerks' and 'Pulp Fiction'. I hope he sticks to directing films that he himself writes. I have the feeling he wants to expand his horizons but isn't quite sure how to go about it without alienating his huge fanbase. I have great confidence in him, and feel that if he puts his heart into it, he can be a great filmmaker, instead of a good one. I think for him to do so, he could do himself a great service and read a few less comic books and watch a lot more movies, particularly by the Hollywood greats from the Golden Age, such as Sir Alfred Hitchcock, Howard Hawks, Raoul Walsh and John Ford. It would be quite exciting to see what he comes up with, once his creative juices are recharged.

Filipe Manuel Neto
Filipe Manuel Neto
★ 5

**A rude but understandable film.** I just saw this film, and honestly I was hoping for a slightly different comedy, with a more elaborate, more conventional structure and not based so much on endless dialogues. It is, however, an independent film, made a little outside of what traditional circuits and big studios are, and the budget is limited. If we consider all this, I think we can understand the film better. The film basically accompanies a day in the life of two commercial employees who hate their jobs but need them, like any mortal. They work closely together and are friends, but the day promises not to be easy for either of them. The film is based on jokes of a very rude nature, sometimes also on the inelegant manners of the characters. There are a lot of allusions to pop culture throughout the movie as well, and I didn't always get that. It's not the kind of humor I really enjoy, though the film has its moments. Perhaps this style of humor works better with young people and teenagers than with someone more adult... The cast features a number of actors that I don't really know. Brian O'Halloran and Jeff Anderson had their most relevant work in this film, from what I've seen. The film is quite restrained in terms of costumes and scenery, and I believe that real stores were used for the production. What can be considered a weakness, the low budget, was to some extent an advantage, taking into account the type of film they preferred to make here. The cinematography is very good and well used, and is perhaps the film's most artistic feature.

おすすめの作品