FindKey

FindKeyは、100万件を超える映画・ドラマ作品、そして数百万人の人物データと独自の16類型CTI診断を統合した、日本初の感情特化型映画レコメンドエンジンです。

Find (見つける) + Key (鍵・正解)

映画に限らず、人生のヒントを見つける場所です。

FindKeyについてロケ地 (試験中)利用規約プライバシーポリシーお問い合わせ
© 2026 Bennu Inc.TMDB Logo

本サービスはTMDB APIを利用していますが、TMDBによる推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。

マスク2
マスク2

マスク2

20051h 37m★ 4.2ファンタジーコメディファミリーアドベンチャー

あらすじ

アニメ製作会社に勤めるティムは、妻と平凡な生活を送っていた。ところがある日、愛犬が緑色の奇妙なマスクを拾ってきたことから、彼の運命は一転。何とそれは、かぶった者の秘めたる欲望を解放する伝説のマスクだったのだ。そうとは知らずマスクをかぶったティムは、仮装パーティで緑色の怪人となって大騒ぎ。一躍ヒーローになった彼は帰宅後、そのままの勢いで妻とベッドイン。そして10ヵ月後、待望のベビーが生まれる。

作品考察・見どころ

本作の魅力は、育児という普遍的テーマをカートゥーンの狂気へ昇華させた独創性にあります。アラン・カミング演じるロキの変幻自在な演技は、神話的重厚さと軽快さを併せ持ち、画面に予測不能なエネルギーを充満させています。実写とCGが融合した視覚演出は、動く夢と悪夢が入り混じった唯一無二の体験を観客に提供します。 父子の絆をマスクの力で描くことで、親になる戸惑いや喜びを身体的表現で描き切っています。ジェイミー・ケネディの翻弄されつつ父性に目覚める姿は、家族の在り方を問いかける力強いメッセージを放ちます。混沌の中に深い愛が脈打つ、情熱的で破天荒なエンターテインメントの真髄がここに凝縮されています。

興行成績

製作費: $84,000,000 (126億円)

興行収入: $59,918,422 (90億円)

推定収支: $-24,081,578 (-36億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

Hulu
U-NEXT
HBO Max on U-Next

予告・トレイラー

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

Hulu
U-NEXT
HBO Max on U-Next

レンタル・購入

Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies

キャスト

ジェイミー・ケネディ
ジェイミー・ケネディ
Tim Avery
アラン・カミング
アラン・カミング
Loki
Traylor Howard
Traylor Howard
Tonya Avery
カル・ペン
カル・ペン
Jorge
スティーヴン・ライト
スティーヴン・ライト
Daniel Moss
Ben Stein
Ben Stein
Dr. Neuman
No Image
Peter Callan
Museum Redneck
No Image
Liam Falconer
Alvey
No Image
Ryan Falconer
Alvey
No Image
Brett Pickup
Museum Boy

スタッフ・制作会社

監督: Lawrence Guterman

脚本: Lance Khazei

音楽: Randy Edelman

制作: Erica Huggins / Kent Alterman / Dae Won Cho

撮影監督: Greg Gardiner

制作会社: New Line Cinema / Kumar Mobiliengesellschaft mbH & Co. Projekt Nr. 1 KG / Dark Horse Entertainment / Radar Pictures

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

r96sk
r96sk
★ 4

Just as awful as I had anticipated. With that said, it's nothing so bad that it offended me - it's simply totally and utterly bad, to the point I kinda find it hard to hate on it because I just don't have any thoughts on it. It is, without question, undoubtedly worse than 1994's <em>'The Mask'</em> in every conceivable way though. Jamie Kennedy's version of this Dark Horse Comics character is truly dreadful, especially visually, though thankfully the film doesn't actually give that much air time to Kennedy as The Mask; like, he's there but it's predominantly the dog and the son that get much of the screen time alongside Alan Cumming's Loki - to slightly better effect too, the way the kid is animated kinda nearly works... it doesn't, but almost. Ryan Reynolds, <a href="https://youtu.be/X4ctYxLoXdo?t=406" rel="nofollow">according</a> to Kennedy himself, possibly wanted this role. It's lucky Reynolds didn't get his way, or he'd be stuck with a green ghoul in his past. <a href="https://letterboxd.com/film/green-lantern/" rel="nofollow">Oh, wait!</a> 4/10 is probably generous on my part, though there are far worse films out there that actually annoy me - <em>'Son of the Mask'</em> honestly doesn't. It kinda just exists and I'm almost nonplussed about it.

Filipe Manuel Neto
Filipe Manuel Neto
★ 1

**A film made to make money off the success of its predecessor, but which has nothing to do with it.** Anyone who saw the movie “The Mask” with Jim Carey, from 1994, cannot remain indifferent. It's one of those family comedies that marked the 90's and that strongly contributed to the meteoric rise of the comic actor's career. It was a film that, in my opinion, did not need a sequel, but that, if it came to exist, would have to have the same crew and a similar cast (that is, keeping, at least, Carey and some other actors). Unfortunately, this movie does everything it shouldn't have done. In fact, any comparison between the first movie and this crap is pointless. It is not the first time that I see that there are sequels made to profit from great successes and that have virtually no connection with the preceding films. This is just one more example. Jim Carey was right not to want to associate himself with a project that failed at the outset, not least because most of the cast that associated with the film did not manage to take advantage of it beyond the financial inflow. The film is clearly expensive and stupid. It had a high budget, which was invested in a range of CGI assets and massive and sometimes impressive visual effects, but everything else is lacking. And the film's biggest flaw couldn't be any other: the script is so amateurish and idiotic that it seems to have been written by ten-year-old children. Ideas are bad, there are a number of situations in which we feel that the public is being mocked, and our intelligence is being mocked too. Another problem with this film is the total lack of humor. The movie was supposed to be funny and make us laugh, but we couldn't find anything funny. Much of what is shown was already done – and better – in the first film, and what has been introduced as new is a series of scatological or gross jokes that, I think, could have been cut. Even children's audiences might not be very interested in seeing this, if you think about it. The cast does what they can, but they can't do much. Deep down, the actors end up being the least to blame for the fact that the film is rubbish. Alan Cumming turns out to be the best actor present and is the only one worth seeing work. He's an effective villain and his comedic streak is interesting, but totally wasted here. Bob Hoskins makes an appearance, but it is innocuous and adds nothing to the film. Jamie Kennedy is bad, he does a bad job, and surely he must be sorry he got into this movie. The rest is basically a bunch of extras, even when they have to talk.

おすすめの作品