FindKey

FindKeyは、100万件を超える映画・ドラマ作品、そして数百万人の人物データと独自の16類型CTI診断を統合した、日本初の感情特化型映画レコメンドエンジンです。

Find (見つける) + Key (鍵・正解)

映画に限らず、人生のヒントを見つける場所です。

FindKeyについてロケ地 (試験中)利用規約プライバシーポリシーお問い合わせ
© 2026 Bennu Inc.TMDB Logo

本サービスはTMDB APIを利用していますが、TMDBによる推奨・認定を受けたものではありません。

三銃士
三銃士

三銃士

19931h 45m★ 6.4アクションアドベンチャーコメディロマンス
Disney Plus

あらすじ

17世紀のフランス。若き冒険家ダルタニアンは、国王に仕える近衛銃士隊に入ろうとパリに向かうが、既に銃士隊は解散させられていた。国王ルイ13世とアン王妃が住む城で銃士隊を解散させたのは、国王の失脚をたくらむリシュリュー枢機卿で、残った銃士隊のメンバーは、アトス、アラミス、ポルトスという3人だけだ。アトスたちと出会ったダルタニアンは彼らと手を組み、枢機卿の野望をくだこうと誓い合い行動を起こす。

作品考察・見どころ

AIが作品の魅力を深く読み解いています

興行成績

製作費: $30,000,000 (45億円)

興行収入: $111,898,845 (168億円)

推定収支: $81,898,845 (123億円)

※製作費・興行収入はTMDBのデータを参照しています。収支は(興行収入 - 製作費)で算出したFindKey独自の推定値であり、広告宣伝費や諸経費は含まれません (1ドル=150円換算)。

口コミ

あなたの評価を記録する

予告・トレイラー

配信サービス

サブスクリプション

Disney Plus

レンタル・購入

Apple TV Store

キャスト

クリス・オドネル
クリス・オドネル
D'Artagnan
キーファー・サザーランド
キーファー・サザーランド
Athos
オリヴァー・プラット
オリヴァー・プラット
Porthos
チャーリー・シーン
チャーリー・シーン
Aramis
ティム・カリー
ティム・カリー
Cardinal Richelieu
Rebecca De Mornay
Rebecca De Mornay
Milady
Paul McGann
Paul McGann
Girard / Jussac
ガブリエル・アンウォー
ガブリエル・アンウォー
Queen Anne
マイケル・ウィンコット
マイケル・ウィンコット
Rochefort
ジュリー・デルピー
ジュリー・デルピー
Constance

スタッフ・制作会社

監督: スティーヴン・ヘレク

脚本: David Loughery / アレクサンドル・デュマ・ペール

音楽: マイケル・ケイメン

制作: Jon Avnet / Roger Birnbaum / Jordan Kerner

撮影監督: Dean Semler

制作会社: Walt Disney Pictures / Caravan Pictures

TMDB ユーザーのレビュー

r96sk
r96sk
★ 8

What's more overdone? The gratuitous cleavage shots or the catchphrase? I did enjoy <em>'The Three Musketeers'</em> - but boy is there a load of cleavage shoved in your face. The famous Musketeer phrase is also said <b>a lot</b>. This film is a little bit of a weird one, in terms of how I feel about it. It's clearly enjoyable but I wasn't sure if it deserves the step above rating that I've given, by the end I think it just about gets there. I like the plot, the locations and pacing, but it took a relative while for the cast to grow on me. Chris O'Donnell (D'Artagnan) and Oliver Platt (Porthos) would be my standouts, I liked both of them pretty much from the beginning; it's my first time seeing O'Donnell, away from his <em>'Batman'</em> appearances, though have seen Platt a number of times. Charlie Sheen (Aramis) and Kiefer Sutherland (Athos) are the ones who don't work amazingly in my opinion. I don't love their acting styles here, while I didn't sense enough chemistry between the two - and Platt, for that matter. Tim Curry, meanwhile, is always hit-and-miss to me - not helped by the fact that <em>'Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties'</em> is my biggest memory of him, I'm constantly hearing Prince XII whenever he talks - my apologies, Mr. Curry. Lastly for the cast, it's also interesting (for me) seeing Paul McGann involved - I've very recently become aware of him through television's <em>'Luther'</em>. Funny ol' world. Sorry for the few tangents there. My final thoughts on this film: It's entertaining. Worth a watch.

tmdb28039023
tmdb28039023
★ 1

They say a hero is only as good as the villain. If, by the same token, a villain is only as bad as the hero, then The Three Musketeers has, proportionately speaking, the best villains of any movie. Tim Curry and the diabolical Michael Wincott are inspired choices for Cardinal Richelieu and the Count (for some reason Captain in this movie) de Rochefort. In contrast, Charlie Sheen, Kiefer Sutherland, Chris O'Donnell, and Oliver Platt as Aramis, Athos, D'Artagnan, and Porthos, respectively, are like the Three Stooges without Moe, Larry, and Curly (i.e., Shemp, Joe, and Joe). Athos, Porthos, Aramis, d'Artagnan; for those who have read Dumas's Musketeers saga, these aren't mere mortals; they are titans, demigods, princes of the Universe. Even The Man in the Iron Mask – an otherwise bad movie – knew that the Musketeers demand actors who can throw their weight around; in that case, Jeremy Irons, John Malkovich, Gérard Depardieu, and Gabriel Byrne (no points for guessing Depardieu's role). Sutherland is the only film actor among the quote-unquote heroes; the rest are glorified TV stars. Sheen in the role of Aramis is simply outrageous; it's true that both the character and the actor are fond of women, but Aramis likes ladies and Sheen likes whores, and it's safe to say that the actor and the character make their conquests in very different circles. Moreover, Aramis has class, grace, and elegance; Sheen, on the other hand, has exactly what he deserves (this film was released just six years after Wall Street, but Sheen's career even then was for all intents and purposes over). As for O'Donnell, what can you really say about him? Dumas's original novel opens with one of the best father-and-son heart-to-hearts in literature (although the gold standard remains Polonius and Laertes in Hamlet). At the beginning of The Three Musketeers, though, D'Artagnan Sr. is already pushing daisies; “my father was a musketeer”, boasts Junior; “the personal bodyguard of the King”, to which someone, quite rightly, replies: “the King was assassinated. Your father was a failure". If it's any consolation, at least he wasn't as big a flop as this movie (which ends on a very positive note, and not just because it's finally over; similar to its protagonists and antagonists, its official theme song is as good as the movie is bad).

CinemaSerf
CinemaSerf
★ 6

Ok, first things first - this has nothing at all to do the Dumas' book. We ought to be clear on that before we continue through this Disneyfied interpretation of this classic story. A way too handsome Chris O'Donnell is "D'Artagnan" who arrives in Paris determined to follow in his father's footsteps and join the King's Musketeers. There is a fly in his ointment, though - the evil Cardinal Richelieu (Tim Curry) has seen to it that this particular militia has been disbanded in disgrace. Through a series of mishaps, he finds himself facing three duels with erstwhile musketeers - Messieurs Aramis, Porthos and Athos who all end up fighting the Cardinal's guard and unite... Charlie Sheen, Kiefer Sutherland and Oliver Platt are his colleagues as they struggle to restore their legion and simultaneously avert an English invasion, and quite probably a coup to replace the infantile King Louis. It's quite well paced, there is plenty of action and Curry is clearly having a bit of a laugh as the evil churchman. Otherwise, however, it's an unremarkable remake lacking much of the charm and cunning of either the 1948 or Richard Lester's 1973 romp.

おすすめの作品